Social-ecological enabling conditions for payments for ecosystem services

被引:32
|
作者
Huber-Stearns, Heidi R. [1 ]
Bennett, Drew E. [2 ]
Posner, Stephen [3 ]
Richards, Ryan C. [4 ,5 ]
Fair, Jenn Hoyle [6 ]
Cousins, Stella J. M. [7 ]
Romulo, Chelsie L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Inst Sustainable Environm, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Warner Coll Nat Resources, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[5] Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Ctr Conservat & Sustainabil, Front Royal, VA USA
[6] Yale Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2017年 / 22卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
content analysis; enabling conditions; environmental governance; environmental synthesis; payments for ecosystem services; social-ecological systems; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; WATERSHED SERVICES; PUBLIC-POLICY; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.5751/ES-08979-220118
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The concept of "enabling conditions" centers on conditions that facilitate approaches to addressing social and ecological challenges. Although multiple fields have independently addressed the concept of enabling conditions, the literature lacks a shared understanding or integration of concepts. We propose a more synthesized understanding of enabling conditions beyond disciplinary boundaries by focusing on the enabling conditions that influence the implementation of a range of environmental policies termed payments for ecosystem services (PES). Through an analysis of key literature from different disciplinary perspectives, we examined how researchers and practitioners refer to and identify enabling conditions within the context of PES. Through our synthesis, we identified 24 distinct enabling conditions organized within 4 broad themes: biophysical, economic, governance, and social-cultural conditions. We found that the literature coalesces around certain enabling conditions, such as strong ecosystem science and existing institutions, regardless of disciplinary background or journal audience. We also observed key differences in how authors perceive the direction of influence for property type, program objectives, and number of actors. Additionally, we noted an emphasis on the importance of the contextual nature of many enabling conditions that may cause certain conditions to have a disproportionate impact on successful implementation in some circumstances. Unraveling the relative importance of specific enabling conditions in diverse contexts remains a research frontier. Ultimately, no single disciplinary perspective is likely to provide all necessary insights for PES creation, and given the intertwined nature of enabling conditions, practitioners need to consider insights from multiple dimensions. Our work suggests opportunities to better connect diverse conversations through integration of concepts, a common vocabulary, and a synthetic framework.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring social-ecological impacts on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Peng, Jian
    Luo, Yuhang
    Qiu, Sijing
    Dong, Jianquan
    Zhang, Zimo
    Vercruysse, Kim
    Grabowski, Robert C.
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 197
  • [32] Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services: what variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrstrom drainage basin?
    Meacham, Megan
    Queiroz, Cibele
    Norstrom, Albert V.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (01):
  • [33] Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Pascual, Unai
    Phelps, Jacob
    Garmendia, Eneko
    Brown, Katrina
    Corbera, Esteve
    Martin, Adrian
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Muradian, Roldan
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (11) : 1027 - 1036
  • [34] Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Beltran, Bray J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 107
  • [35] Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    McClanahan, Tim R.
    Kittinger, John N.
    Hoey, Andrew S.
    Gaoue, Orou G.
    Graham, Nicholas A. J.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [36] Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs
    Michele L. Barnes
    Örjan Bodin
    Tim R. McClanahan
    John N. Kittinger
    Andrew S. Hoey
    Orou G. Gaoue
    Nicholas A. J. Graham
    [J]. Nature Communications, 10
  • [37] A social-ecological framework for "micromanaging" microbial services
    Peralta, Ariane L.
    Stuart, Diana
    Kent, Angela D.
    Lennon, Jay T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (09) : 524 - 531
  • [38] Potential Futures for Coastal Wolves and Their Ecosystem Services in Alaska, With Implications for Management of a Social-Ecological System
    Gilbert, Sophie L.
    Haynes, Trevor
    Lindberg, Mark S.
    Albert, David M.
    Kissling, Michelle
    Lynch, Laurel
    Person, Dave
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [39] Place-based social-ecological research is crucial for designing collective management of ecosystem services
    Berthet, Elsa T.
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Gaba, Sabrina
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 55
  • [40] Ecosystem services and urban development in coastal Social-Ecological Systems: The Bay of Cadiz case study
    de Andres, Maria
    Manuel Barragan, Juan
    Garcia Sanabria, Javier
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 154 : 155 - 167