Detailed evaluation of Mobius3D dose calculation accuracy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy

被引:17
|
作者
Kim, Jihun [1 ]
Han, Min Cheol [1 ]
Lee, Eungman [2 ]
Park, Kwangwoo [1 ]
Chang, Kyung Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Dong Wook [1 ]
Kim, Jin Sung [1 ]
Hong, Chae-Seon [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Mobius3D; Patient-specific quality assurance; Multileaf collimator modeling; Accuracy evaluation; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRY SYSTEM; EPID DOSIMETRY; AGILITY MLC; LOG FILES; QA; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a detailed evaluation of dose calculation accuracy and clinical feasibility of Mobius3D. Of particular importance, multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling accuracy in the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm was investigated. Methods: Mobius3D was fully commissioned by following the vendor-suggested procedures, including dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization. The DLG optimization determined an optimal DLG correction factor which minimized the average difference between calculated and measured doses for 13 patient volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Two sets of step-and-shoot plans were created to examine MLC and off-axis open fields modeling accuracy of the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm: MLC test set and off-axis open field test set. The WA plans were delivered to MapCHECK for the MLC tests and an ionization chamber for the off-axis open field test, and these measured doses were compared to Mobius3D-calculated doses. Results: The mean difference between the calculated and measured doses across the 13 VMAT plans was 0.6% with an optimal DLG correction factor of 1.0. The mean percentage of pixels passing gamma from a 3%/1 mm gamma analysis for the MLC WA set was 43.5% across the MLC tests. For the off-axis open field tests, the Mobius3D-calculated dose for 1.5 cm square field was - 4.6% lower than the chamber-measured dose. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that Mobius3D has dose calculation uncertainties for small fields and MLC tongue-and-groove design is not adequately taken into consideration in Mobius3D. Careful consideration of DLG correction factor, which affects the resulting dose distributions, is required when commissioning Mobius3D for patient-specific QA.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the Dosimetric Leaf Gap Correction Factor of Mobius3D Dose Calculation for Volumetric-modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans
    Sawapabmongkon, Thitipong
    Changkaew, Pimolpun
    Puttanawarut, Chanon
    Tangboonduangjit, Puangpen
    Khachonkham, Suphalak
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 49 (02) : 261 - 269
  • [2] Impact of Plan Complexity On the Delivery Accuracy and Dosimetric Accuracy of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Li, G.
    Li, Y.
    Wang, Q.
    Xiao, J.
    Bai, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2892 - 2892
  • [3] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [4] Impact of small MU/segment and dose rate on delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
    Huang, Long
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Mastroianni, Anthony
    Djemil, Toufik
    Cui, Taoran
    Xia, Ping
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (03): : 203 - 210
  • [5] Dose calculation for hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy: approximating continuous arc delivery and tongue-and-groove modeling
    Yang, Jie
    Tang, Grace
    Zhang, Pengpeng
    Hunt, Margie
    Lim, Seng B.
    LoSasso, Thomas
    Mageras, Gig
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (02): : 3 - 13
  • [6] 3D Dosimetric verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy by portal dosimetry
    Mans, Anton
    Remeijer, Peter
    Olaciregui-Ruiz, Igor
    Wendling, Markus
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    Mijnheer, Ben
    van Herk, Marcel
    Stroom, Joep C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 94 (02) : 181 - 187
  • [7] Oral contrast agents lead to underestimation of dose calculation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for pelvic irradiation
    Jing Hao
    Tian Yuan
    Tang Yu
    Wang Shu-Lian
    Jin Jing
    Song Yong-Wen
    Liu Yue-Ping
    Fang Hui
    Chen Bo
    Qi Shu-Nan
    Tang Yuan
    Lu Ning-Ning
    Yang Yong
    Li Ning
    Li Ye-Xiong
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2020, 133 (17) : 2061 - 2070
  • [8] Oral contrast agents lead to underestimation of dose calculation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for pelvic irradiation
    Jing, Hao
    Tian, Yuan
    Tang, Yu
    Wang, Shu-Lian
    Jin, Jing
    Song, Yong-Wen
    Liu, Yue-Ping
    Fang, Hui
    Chen, Bo
    Qi, Shu-Nan
    Tang, Yuan
    Lu, Ning-Ning
    Yang, Yong
    Li, Ning
    Li, Ye-Xiong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 133 (17) : 2061 - 2070
  • [9] Dosimetric Evaluation of Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy (Rapid Arc) for Primary Leiomyosarcoma in the Spine
    Wu, Yong-Zhong
    Jin, Fu
    Wang, Ying
    Zhou, Juan
    Wu, Li-Hua
    He, Guang-Lei
    Qiu, Da
    He, Ya-Nan
    Liu, Xian-Feng
    Zhong, Ming-Song
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (05) : 387 - 394
  • [10] Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the helical diode array using volumetric-modulated arc therapy for small targets
    Ono, Tomohiro
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Adachi, Takanori
    Iramina, Hiraku
    Fujimoto, Takahiro
    Uto, Megumi
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (07):