Detailed evaluation of Mobius3D dose calculation accuracy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy

被引:17
|
作者
Kim, Jihun [1 ]
Han, Min Cheol [1 ]
Lee, Eungman [2 ]
Park, Kwangwoo [1 ]
Chang, Kyung Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Dong Wook [1 ]
Kim, Jin Sung [1 ]
Hong, Chae-Seon [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Mobius3D; Patient-specific quality assurance; Multileaf collimator modeling; Accuracy evaluation; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRY SYSTEM; EPID DOSIMETRY; AGILITY MLC; LOG FILES; QA; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a detailed evaluation of dose calculation accuracy and clinical feasibility of Mobius3D. Of particular importance, multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling accuracy in the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm was investigated. Methods: Mobius3D was fully commissioned by following the vendor-suggested procedures, including dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization. The DLG optimization determined an optimal DLG correction factor which minimized the average difference between calculated and measured doses for 13 patient volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Two sets of step-and-shoot plans were created to examine MLC and off-axis open fields modeling accuracy of the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm: MLC test set and off-axis open field test set. The WA plans were delivered to MapCHECK for the MLC tests and an ionization chamber for the off-axis open field test, and these measured doses were compared to Mobius3D-calculated doses. Results: The mean difference between the calculated and measured doses across the 13 VMAT plans was 0.6% with an optimal DLG correction factor of 1.0. The mean percentage of pixels passing gamma from a 3%/1 mm gamma analysis for the MLC WA set was 43.5% across the MLC tests. For the off-axis open field tests, the Mobius3D-calculated dose for 1.5 cm square field was - 4.6% lower than the chamber-measured dose. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that Mobius3D has dose calculation uncertainties for small fields and MLC tongue-and-groove design is not adequately taken into consideration in Mobius3D. Careful consideration of DLG correction factor, which affects the resulting dose distributions, is required when commissioning Mobius3D for patient-specific QA.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A class solution for volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning in postprostatectomy radiotherapy
    Forde, Elizabeth
    Bromley, Regina
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Eade, Thomas
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (03) : 261 - 265
  • [42] Dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for children with neuroblastoma
    Liu Xia
    Liu Zhikai
    Pang Tingtian
    Dong Tingting
    Qiu Jie
    儿科学研究(英文), 2020, 04 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [43] A pilot study of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma
    Li Runxiao
    Cao Yankun
    Wang Lan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (02): : 139 - 144
  • [44] Evaluation of Healthy Tissue Dose at Different Regions between Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Plans in the Treatment of Various Cancers
    Krishnan, Jayapalan
    Rao, Suresh
    Hegde, Sanath
    Shetty, Jayarama
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 44 (03) : 213 - 221
  • [45] Knowledge-based dose volume histogram prediction for lung tumor volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Brand, Johann
    Szkitsak, Juliane
    Speer, Stefan
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3465 - S3467
  • [46] A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Wang, Qingxin
    Dai, Jianrong
    Zhang, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (10)
  • [47] A Prediction Model for Pretreatment Dose Verification of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Using Machine Learning
    Li, G.
    Yuan, Q.
    Bai, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E612 - E612
  • [48] Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Tol, Jim P.
    Dahele, Max
    Delaney, Alexander R.
    Doornaert, Patricia
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (04) : 1818 - 1828
  • [49] Validation of Delivery Consistency for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    Woon, Wui Ann
    Ravindran, Paul B.
    Ekayanake, Piyasiri
    Lim, Yivonne Yih Fang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [50] A deep learning-based dose calculation method for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Liang, Bin
    Xia, Wenlong
    Wei, Ran
    Xu, Yuan
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Dai, Jianrong
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)