Detailed evaluation of Mobius3D dose calculation accuracy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy

被引:17
|
作者
Kim, Jihun [1 ]
Han, Min Cheol [1 ]
Lee, Eungman [2 ]
Park, Kwangwoo [1 ]
Chang, Kyung Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Dong Wook [1 ]
Kim, Jin Sung [1 ]
Hong, Chae-Seon [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Mobius3D; Patient-specific quality assurance; Multileaf collimator modeling; Accuracy evaluation; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRY SYSTEM; EPID DOSIMETRY; AGILITY MLC; LOG FILES; QA; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a detailed evaluation of dose calculation accuracy and clinical feasibility of Mobius3D. Of particular importance, multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling accuracy in the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm was investigated. Methods: Mobius3D was fully commissioned by following the vendor-suggested procedures, including dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization. The DLG optimization determined an optimal DLG correction factor which minimized the average difference between calculated and measured doses for 13 patient volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Two sets of step-and-shoot plans were created to examine MLC and off-axis open fields modeling accuracy of the Mobius3D dose calculation algorithm: MLC test set and off-axis open field test set. The WA plans were delivered to MapCHECK for the MLC tests and an ionization chamber for the off-axis open field test, and these measured doses were compared to Mobius3D-calculated doses. Results: The mean difference between the calculated and measured doses across the 13 VMAT plans was 0.6% with an optimal DLG correction factor of 1.0. The mean percentage of pixels passing gamma from a 3%/1 mm gamma analysis for the MLC WA set was 43.5% across the MLC tests. For the off-axis open field tests, the Mobius3D-calculated dose for 1.5 cm square field was - 4.6% lower than the chamber-measured dose. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that Mobius3D has dose calculation uncertainties for small fields and MLC tongue-and-groove design is not adequately taken into consideration in Mobius3D. Careful consideration of DLG correction factor, which affects the resulting dose distributions, is required when commissioning Mobius3D for patient-specific QA.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer
    Cima, Simona
    Cima, S.
    Valli, M. C.
    Richetti, A.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (12) : 1142 - 1143
  • [22] Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS
    Vikraman, Subramani
    Manigandan, Durai
    Karrthick, Karukkupalayam Palaniappan
    Sambasivaselli, Raju
    Senniandavar, Vellaingiri
    Ramu, Mahendran
    Rajesh, Thiyagarajan
    Lutz, Muller
    Muthukumaran, Manavalan
    Karthikeyan, Nithyanantham
    Tejinder, Kataria
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (01): : 192 - 207
  • [23] A generalized inverse planning tool for volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Cao, Daliang
    Afghan, Muhammad K. N.
    Ye, Jinsong
    Chen, Fan
    Shepard, David M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (21): : 6725 - 6738
  • [24] Assessment of the robustness of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for lung radiotherapy
    Edmunds, K.
    Bedford, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 86 (1023):
  • [25] QA FOR VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC THERAPY AT THE NKI-AVL
    Mans, A.
    Olaciregui, I.
    Rozendaal, R.
    Tielenburg, R.
    Vijlbrief, R.
    Sonke, J. J.
    Mijnheer, B.
    van Herk, M.
    Stroom, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S83 - S83
  • [26] Assessing the role of volumetric-modulated arc therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xi, Mian
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Qiao-Qiao
    Zhao, Lei
    Zhang, Rui
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (03): : 81 - 90
  • [27] The importance of collimator angle error in volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Puchades-Puchades, Vicente
    Serna-Berna, Alfredo
    Mata-Colodro, Fernando
    Ramos-Amores, David
    Alcaraz-Banos, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2015, 14 (03) : 323 - 330
  • [28] Evaluating Mobius3D Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small-Field Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Kim, Changhwan
    Kim, Jihun
    Lee, Young Kyu
    Shin, Han-Back
    Han, Min Cheol
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, Jin Sung
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [29] Intensity-modulated proton therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3D conformal radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma
    Adeberg, S.
    Harrabil, S. B.
    Bougatf, N.
    Bernhardt, D.
    Rieber, J.
    Koerber, S. A.
    Syed, M.
    Sprave, T.
    Mohr, A.
    Abdollahi, A.
    Haberer, T.
    Combs, S. E.
    Herfarth, K.
    Debus, J.
    Rieken, S.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (11) : 770 - 779
  • [30] Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
    Li, Jun
    To, David
    Gunn, Vickie
    Shi, Wenyin
    Yu, Yan
    Liu, Haisong
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17 : 1 - 6