Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol

被引:30
|
作者
Stergiou, George S. [1 ]
Giovas, Periklis P. [1 ]
Gkinos, Charilaos P. [1 ]
Tzamouranis, Dimitris G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Univ, Sotiria Hosp, Dept Med, Hypertens Ctr, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
accuracy; European Society of Hypertension; hybrid sphygmomanometer; International Protocol; office blood pressure; professional device; validation;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282c9acb0
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective Assessment of the accuracy of the A&D UM-101 mercury-free professional device for auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Further to auscultation, the device has a button to mark readings during deflation. Methods Fifteen adults were included in phase 1 and another 18 in phase 2. Simultaneous BP measurements were taken by two observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) four times, sequentially with three measurements using the tested device (two connected tested devices, one used with and the other without the mark button). Results In phase 1, the device produced 44/45/45 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for systolic BP (SBP) and 39/43/45 for diastolic (DBP). In phase 2.1, 87/97/99 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for SBP, and 91/97/99 for DBP (using the mark button 65/93/98 for SBP and 76/96/99 for DBP). In phase 2.2, 29 participants had at least two of their SBP differences within 5 mmHg and none had any differences within 5 mmHg, whereas 32 and none, respectively, for DBP (with mark 24/4 participants for SBP; 29/1 for DBP). Mean SBP differences were -1.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg and DBP -1.3 +/- 3.0 (with mark -3.6 +/- 4.2 and -2.8 +/- 3.7). The difference in SBP measured by the tested device with versus without using the mark button was 3.0 +/- 3.3 mmHg (P<0.001) and DBP 1.9 +/- 2.5 mmHg (P<0.001). Conclusion The device comfortably passed the validation protocol requirements. Using the mark button, the device, however, failed to meet the validation criteria. Therefore, it is recommended for clinical use without using the mark button.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of the visomat comfort eco blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol
    Perkovic, Davor
    Guarnieri, Chiara
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2009, 14 (04) : 178 - 180
  • [32] Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol
    Zeng, Wei-Fang
    Liu, Ming
    Kang, Yuan-Yuan
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (04) : 223 - 226
  • [33] Validation of the blood pressure measurement device Erkameter 125 PRO according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Beime, Beate
    Deutsch, Cornelia
    Krueger, Ralf
    Zimmermann, Erik
    Bramlage, Peter
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2016, 21 (06) : 356 - 360
  • [34] Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol
    Ragazzo, Fabio
    Saladini, Francesca
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (01) : 59 - 62
  • [35] Validation of the Microlife BPA100 Plus device for self-home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol
    Stergiou, George S.
    Giovas, Periklis R.
    Neofytou, Michalis S.
    Adamopoulos, Dionysios N.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2006, 11 (03) : 157 - 160
  • [36] Validation of the blood pressure measurement device Beurer BM 28 according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Deutsch, Cornelia
    Bramlage, Carsten
    Botta, Beate
    Krueger, Ralf
    Forstner, Klaus
    Bramlage, Peter
    Beime, Beate
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2021, 26 (04) : 292 - 298
  • [37] A computer program for blood pressure measurement validation studies in China according to the ESH International Protocol
    Zhang, X.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S251 - S252
  • [38] Validation of the A&D BP UA-1200BLE device for home blood pressure measurement according to the ISO 81060-2:2013 standard
    Kario, Kazuomi
    Saito, Kimiyo
    Sato, Keiko
    Hamasaki, Haruna
    Suwa, Hiromi
    Okura, Ayako
    Hoshide, Satoshi
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2018, 23 (06) : 312 - 314
  • [39] Validation of the A&D UA-774 (UA-767Plus) device for self-measurement of blood pressure
    Verdecchia, P
    Angeli, F
    Poeta, F
    Reboldi, GP
    Borgioni, C
    Pittavini, L
    Porcellati, C
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2004, 9 (04) : 225 - 229
  • [40] Validation of the Nissei DS-250 ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device according to the International Protocol
    Altunkan, S
    Iliman, N
    Altunkan, E
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 : S22 - S22