Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review

被引:4
|
作者
Campagna, Giuseppe [1 ]
Panico, Giovanni [1 ]
Lombisani, Andrea [1 ]
Vacca, Lorenzo [1 ,4 ]
Caramazza, Daniela [1 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pubb, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pelv, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pub, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, PID Ginecol Oncol & Chirurg Ginecol Miniinvas, Messina, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Sanit Pubbl, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pel, Largo F Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Urogynecology; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral ligament suspension; Laparoscopy; Apical suspension; Reconstructive surgery; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; UTERINE SUSPENSION; PROLAPSE; HYSTERECTOMY; REPAIR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.Study Design: A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills pro-gram (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: 26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and sub-jective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re -operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, how-ever grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.Conclusions: LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] UTERINE-SPARING UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION
    Zigman, J. S.
    Navas, J.
    Yazdany, T.
    Rosenman, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S274 - S275
  • [42] Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
    Miller, Beverly J.
    Jones, Brian K.
    Turner, Jonathan S.
    Caliari, Steven R.
    Vaughan, Monique H.
    [J]. JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2022, (186):
  • [43] Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse
    Jan, Haider
    Ghai, Vishalli
    Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : 952 - 953
  • [44] Laparoscopic uteroovarian ligament truncation and uterosacral oophoropexy for idiopathic recurrent ovarian torsion: case report and review of literature
    Paula C Brady
    Aaron K Styer
    [J]. Fertility Research and Practice, 1 (1)
  • [45] Laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic literature review
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Panico, Giovanni
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Lombisani, Andrea
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 264 : 318 - 329
  • [46] Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse
    Xu, Hongge
    Ding, Hongyan
    Shi, Can
    Ge, Qianqian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (10)
  • [47] Rate of ureteral compromise and recurrent prolapse following laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A retrospective study
    Gabra, M. G.
    Winget, V.
    Addis, I.
    Hatch, K.
    Heusinkveld, J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (03) : S815 - S815
  • [48] National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
    Chapman, Graham C.
    Slopnick, Emily A.
    Roberts, Kasey
    Sheyn, David
    Wherley, Susan
    Mahajan, Sangeeta T.
    Pollard, Robert R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [49] Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Techniques for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Uterine Preserving Approach
    Edwards, A.
    Ramirez, Carter A.
    Kim-Fine, S.
    Scime, N., V
    Brennand, E. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S393 - S393
  • [50] Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension
    Ma, Yidi
    Zhang, Ye
    Ma, Congcong
    Wang, Yuan
    Tian, Weijie
    Zhu, Lan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 259 : 12 - 17