National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension

被引:9
|
作者
Chapman, Graham C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Slopnick, Emily A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roberts, Kasey [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheyn, David [1 ,3 ]
Wherley, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Mahajan, Sangeeta T. [1 ,2 ]
Pollard, Robert R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, 11000 Euclid Ave,Lakeside Bldg,4th Floor, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Metrohlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
Adverse events; Apical suspension; Complications; Prolapse; NSQIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity of vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy when performed with uterosacral ligament suspension. Design: Retrospective propensity-score matched cohort study. Setting: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients: We included all patients who had undergone uterosacral ligament suspension and concurrent total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH-USLS) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH-USLS) from 2010 to 2015. We excluded those who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, other surgical procedures for apical pelvic organ prolapse, or had gynecologic malignancy. Interventions: We compared 30-day complication rates in patients who underwent TVH-USLS versus TLH-USLS in both the total study population and a propensity score matched cohort. Measurements and Main Results: The study population consisted of 3,349 patients who underwent TVH-USLS and 484 who underwent TLH-USLS. Patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a significantly higher composite complication rate (11.4% vs 6.4%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 1.3-2.8; p < .01) and a higher serious complication rate (5.6% vs 3.1%, OR 1.8, 1.1 - 3.1; p = .02), which excluded urinary tract infection and superficial surgical site infection. The propensity score analysis was performed, and patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio between the TVH-USLS group and the TLH-USLS group. In the matched cohort, patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a higher composite complication rate than those who underwent TLH-USLS (10.3% vs 6.4%, OR 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; p = .04), whereas the rate of serious complications did not differ between the groups (4.3% vs 3.1%, OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .4). On multivariate logistic regression, TVH-USLS remained an independent predictor of composite complications (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.0-2.6; p = .04) but not serious complications (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7- 2.8; p = .3). Conclusion: In this large national cohort, TVH-USLS was associated with a higher composite complication rate than TLH-USLS, largely secondary to an increased rate of urinary tract infection. After matching, the groups had similar rates of serious complications. These data suggest that TLH-USLS should be viewed as a safe alternative to TVH-USLS. (C) 2020 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of Laparoscopic versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Vault Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy
    Carey, M.
    Alexander, J.
    Rosamilia, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S54 - S55
  • [2] Uterosacral vault suspension at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach
    Houlihan, S.
    Kim-Fine, S.
    Birch, C.
    Tang, S.
    Brennand, E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (03) : S756 - S757
  • [3] Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach
    Sara Houlihan
    Shunaha Kim-Fine
    Colin Birch
    Selphee Tang
    Erin A. Brennand
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2019, 30 : 611 - 621
  • [4] Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach
    Houlihan, Sara
    Kim-Fine, Shunaha
    Birch, Colin
    Tang, Selphee
    Brennand, Erin A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (04) : 611 - 621
  • [5] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    Aparna Diwan
    Charles R. Rardin
    William C. Strohsnitter
    Alexandra Weld
    Peter Rosenblatt
    Neeraj Kohli
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2006, 17 : 79 - 83
  • [6] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    Diwan, A
    Rardin, CR
    Strohsnitter, WC
    Weld, A
    Rosenblatt, P
    Kohli, N
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 17 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [7] Vaginal versus laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: Does approach matter?
    Eto, C. U.
    Northington, G. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (02) : S945 - S945
  • [8] Ureteral Compromise in Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension A Retrospective Cohort
    Barbier, Heather M.
    Smith, Margo Z.
    Eto, Chidimma U.
    Welgoss, Jeffrey A.
    Von Pechmann, Walter
    Horbach, Nicolette
    Gruber, Daniel D.
    [J]. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015, 21 (06): : 363 - 368
  • [9] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [10] The impact of vaginal hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension on vaginal elasticity and sexual function
    Lauterbach, Roy
    Gruenwald, Ilan
    Matanes, Emad
    Matar, Kamel
    Weiner, Zeev
    Lowenstein, Lior
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 258 : 29 - 32