Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review

被引:4
|
作者
Campagna, Giuseppe [1 ]
Panico, Giovanni [1 ]
Lombisani, Andrea [1 ]
Vacca, Lorenzo [1 ,4 ]
Caramazza, Daniela [1 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pubb, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pelv, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pub, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, PID Ginecol Oncol & Chirurg Ginecol Miniinvas, Messina, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Sanit Pubbl, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pel, Largo F Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Urogynecology; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral ligament suspension; Laparoscopy; Apical suspension; Reconstructive surgery; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; UTERINE SUSPENSION; PROLAPSE; HYSTERECTOMY; REPAIR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.Study Design: A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills pro-gram (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: 26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and sub-jective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re -operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, how-ever grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.Conclusions: LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Demonstration of a box-stitch technique for laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension
    Wyman, Allison M.
    Hahn, Lindsey
    Mikhail, Emad
    Hart, Stuart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (12) : 1841 - 1842
  • [22] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [23] Anatomic identification of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A step-by-step procedure
    OuYang, Yinluan
    Xu, Wanwan
    Li, Fan
    Wang, Rui
    Zhao, Xiaofeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (12) : 3587 - 3590
  • [24] Outcome of Laparoscopic versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Vault Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy
    Carey, M.
    Alexander, J.
    Rosamilia, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S54 - S55
  • [25] Anatomic identification of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A step-by-step procedure
    Yinluan OuYang
    Wanwan Xu
    Fan Li
    Rui Wang
    Xiaofeng Zhao
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 3587 - 3590
  • [26] Ureteral Compromise in Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension A Retrospective Cohort
    Barbier, Heather M.
    Smith, Margo Z.
    Eto, Chidimma U.
    Welgoss, Jeffrey A.
    Von Pechmann, Walter
    Horbach, Nicolette
    Gruber, Daniel D.
    [J]. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015, 21 (06): : 363 - 368
  • [27] ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION AND BURCH URETHROPEXY
    Rajender, A.
    Ghoniem, G.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S189 - S190
  • [28] Uterosacral ligament suspension using vNOTES
    Duenas, O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S56 - S56
  • [29] Extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension video
    Martin, L.
    Senderey, E.
    Devakumar, H.
    Schachar, J.
    Hurtdao, E.
    Davila, G. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 : S126 - S126
  • [30] At the Scrub Sink: Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
    Meriwether, Kate V.
    [J]. UROGYNECOLOGY, 2024, 30 (01): : 4 - 6