Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review

被引:4
|
作者
Campagna, Giuseppe [1 ]
Panico, Giovanni [1 ]
Lombisani, Andrea [1 ]
Vacca, Lorenzo [1 ,4 ]
Caramazza, Daniela [1 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pubb, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pelv, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna Bambino & Sanit Pub, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, PID Ginecol Oncol & Chirurg Ginecol Miniinvas, Messina, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Sanit Pubbl, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pel, Largo F Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Urogynecology; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral ligament suspension; Laparoscopy; Apical suspension; Reconstructive surgery; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; UTERINE SUSPENSION; PROLAPSE; HYSTERECTOMY; REPAIR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.Study Design: A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills pro-gram (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: 26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and sub-jective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re -operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, how-ever grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.Conclusions: LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Systematic Review
    Vermeulen, C.
    Schuurman, B.
    Coolen, A.
    Van Leijsen, S.
    Veen, J.
    Bongers, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S52 - S53
  • [2] OUTCOMES OF VAGINAL AND LAPAROSCOPIC UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Pandya, L. K.
    Smith, P. E.
    Hundley, A. F.
    Nekkanti, S.
    Robison, E. H.
    Hudson, C. O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S86 - S86
  • [3] Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
    Ross, J.
    Yuan, A.
    Chapman, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S377 - S377
  • [4] The laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) as effective treatment for apical prolapse: a systematic review
    Vermeulen, C.
    Meijs, P.
    Coolen, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S173 - S173
  • [5] The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vermeulen, C. K. M.
    Schuurman, B.
    Coolen, A. L. W. M.
    Meijs-Hermanns, P. R.
    van Leijsen, S. A. L.
    Veen, J.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (13) : 1568 - 1578
  • [6] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Pasanisi, Francesca
    Cianci, Stefano
    Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
    Pennacchio, Marika
    Torella, Marco
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    Colacurci, Nicola
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [7] Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
    Douligeris, Athanasios
    Kathopoulis, Nikolaos
    Zachariou, Eleftherios
    Mortaki, Anastasia
    Zacharakis, Dimitrios
    Kypriotis, Konstantinos
    Chatzipapas, Ioannis
    Protopapas, Athanasios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06)
  • [8] Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis
    Margulies, Rebecca U.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (02) : 124 - 134
  • [9] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension task trainer
    Youngstrom, M.
    Metcalfe, N.
    Falk, K.
    Ogorek, J.
    Chahine, E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (03) : S857 - S857
  • [10] Uterosacral ligament suspension - is there heterogeneity among surgical techniques? - A systematic review
    Brito, Oliveira
    Gesteira, F.
    Makishi, M.
    Abrao, M. S.
    Lourenco, T. R.
    Andres, M.
    Yi, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S71 - S72