Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability

被引:3
|
作者
Ronsini, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Pasanisi, Francesca [1 ,2 ]
Cianci, Stefano [3 ]
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna [1 ]
Pennacchio, Marika [1 ,2 ]
Torella, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
Colacurci, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp G Martino, Dept Human Pathol Adult & Childhood G Baresi, Obstet & Gynecol Unit, Messina, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
uterosacral ligament suspension; laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgery; mini-invasive surgery (MIS); vaginal; safety; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; UTERINE SUSPENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; COLPOPEXY; ANATOMY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures.Materials and methodsFollowing the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other.DiscussionLaparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vermeulen, C. K. M.
    Schuurman, B.
    Coolen, A. L. W. M.
    Meijs-Hermanns, P. R.
    van Leijsen, S. A. L.
    Veen, J.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (13) : 1568 - 1578
  • [2] The Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Systematic Review
    Vermeulen, C.
    Schuurman, B.
    Coolen, A.
    Van Leijsen, S.
    Veen, J.
    Bongers, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S52 - S53
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
    Douligeris, Athanasios
    Kathopoulis, Nikolaos
    Zachariou, Eleftherios
    Mortaki, Anastasia
    Zacharakis, Dimitrios
    Kypriotis, Konstantinos
    Chatzipapas, Ioannis
    Protopapas, Athanasios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06)
  • [4] OUTCOMES OF VAGINAL AND LAPAROSCOPIC UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Pandya, L. K.
    Smith, P. E.
    Hundley, A. F.
    Nekkanti, S.
    Robison, E. H.
    Hudson, C. O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S86 - S86
  • [5] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Panico, Giovanni
    Lombisani, Andrea
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 277 : 57 - 70
  • [6] Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse
    Xu, Hongge
    Ding, Hongyan
    Shi, Can
    Ge, Qianqian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (10)
  • [7] Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
    Ross, J.
    Yuan, A.
    Chapman, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S377 - S377
  • [8] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yuanzhuo
    Peng, Liao
    Zhang, Jie
    Shen, Hong
    Luo, Deyi
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 133 - 139
  • [9] The laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) as effective treatment for apical prolapse: a systematic review
    Vermeulen, C.
    Meijs, P.
    Coolen, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S173 - S173
  • [10] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Clark, Joseph Y.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 256 - 256