Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability

被引:3
|
作者
Ronsini, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Pasanisi, Francesca [1 ,2 ]
Cianci, Stefano [3 ]
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna [1 ]
Pennacchio, Marika [1 ,2 ]
Torella, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
Colacurci, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp G Martino, Dept Human Pathol Adult & Childhood G Baresi, Obstet & Gynecol Unit, Messina, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
uterosacral ligament suspension; laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgery; mini-invasive surgery (MIS); vaginal; safety; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; UTERINE SUSPENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; COLPOPEXY; ANATOMY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures.Materials and methodsFollowing the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other.DiscussionLaparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 269 - 270
  • [12] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Angermeier, Kenneth W.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 263 - 263
  • [13] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Ross, Lawrence S.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 158 - 158
  • [14] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Russo, Paul
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 176 - 176
  • [15] Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis
    Margulies, Rebecca U.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (02) : 124 - 134
  • [16] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension task trainer
    Youngstrom, M.
    Metcalfe, N.
    Falk, K.
    Ogorek, J.
    Chahine, E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (03) : S857 - S857
  • [17] Paracervical Block or Uterosacral Ligament Infiltration for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Alexander S.
    Ouyang, Chensi
    Carrillo, Jorge F.
    Feranec, Jessica B.
    Lamvu, Georgine M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2021, 76 (06) : 353 - 366
  • [18] Uterosacral ligament suspension - is there heterogeneity among surgical techniques? - A systematic review
    Brito, Oliveira
    Gesteira, F.
    Makishi, M.
    Abrao, M. S.
    Lourenco, T. R.
    Andres, M.
    Yi, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S71 - S72
  • [19] Safety of laparoscopic appendicectomy during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chakraborty, Joy
    Kong, Joseph Cherng
    Su, Wai Kin
    Gourlas, Peter
    Gillespie, Christopher
    Slack, Timothy
    Morris, Bradley
    Lutton, Nicholas
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (11) : 1373 - 1378
  • [20] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension with use of barbed suture
    Rodger, J.
    Pugh, C.
    Long, J. B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (03) : S773 - S773