Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability

被引:5
|
作者
Ronsini, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Pasanisi, Francesca [1 ,2 ]
Cianci, Stefano [3 ]
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna [1 ]
Pennacchio, Marika [1 ,2 ]
Torella, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
Colacurci, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp G Martino, Dept Human Pathol Adult & Childhood G Baresi, Obstet & Gynecol Unit, Messina, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
uterosacral ligament suspension; laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgery; mini-invasive surgery (MIS); vaginal; safety; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; UTERINE SUSPENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; COLPOPEXY; ANATOMY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures.Materials and methodsFollowing the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other.DiscussionLaparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Vaginal Anterior Colporrhaphy
    Di Serio, M.
    Novaretti, G.
    Ghi, T.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S384 - S384
  • [22] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A modification of the box stitch technique
    Jackson, A. A.
    Hidalgo, R. J.
    Chang, E. S.
    Bassaly, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : S822 - S822
  • [23] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications
    Filmar, Gilad A.
    Fisher, Hilaire W.
    Aranda, Enrique
    Lotze, Peter M.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 25 (12) : 1645 - 1653
  • [24] Safety of Laparoscopic vs Open Bariatric Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Reoch, Jennifer
    Mottillo, Salvatore
    Shimony, Avi
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Christou, Nicolas V.
    Joseph, Lawrence
    Poirier, Paul
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 146 (11) : 1314 - 1322
  • [25] Safety and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lord, Amy C.
    Hicks, Georgina
    Pearce, Belinda
    Tanno, Lulu
    Pucher, P. H.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2019, 119 (06) : 349 - 356
  • [26] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications
    Gilad A. Filmar
    Hilaire W. Fisher
    Enrique Aranda
    Peter M. Lotze
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2014, 25 : 1645 - 1653
  • [27] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: Operative outcomes and recurrence rate
    Gabra, M.
    Winget, V.
    Heusinkveld, J.
    Addis, I.
    Hatch, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : S790 - S791
  • [28] Donor safety in live donor laparoscopic liver procurement: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Bekheit
    Philipe-Abrahim Khafagy
    Petru Bucur
    Khaled Katri
    Ahmed Elgendi
    Wael Nabil Abdel-salam
    Eric Vibert
    El-said El-kayal
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 3047 - 3064
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety of dalbavancin
    Monteagudo-Martinez, N.
    Solis-Garcia Del Pozo, J.
    Ikuta, I.
    Galindo, Mf
    Jordan, J.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 20 (09) : 1095 - 1107
  • [30] Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Peng, Cheng
    Ling, Yan
    Ma, Chi
    Ma, Xiaochun
    Fan, Wei
    Niu, Weibo
    Niu, Jun
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (05): : 347 - 353