Risk assessment in straw-based power generation public-private partnership projects in China: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis

被引:90
|
作者
Wu, Yunna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lingwenying [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ruhang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kaifeng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Xiaoshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
PPP mode; Straw-based power generation; Risk assessment; Fuzzy synthetic evaluation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ENERGY PROJECTS; PPP PROJECTS; ALLOCATION; MALAYSIA; SUCCESS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing requirement on energy saving, emission reduction and environmental protection in China, the straw-based power generation is developing rapidly, which can not only provide clean energy, but also address the serious environmental problems caused by farmers' burning straw directly. Currently, the government is gradually applying Public-Private-Partnership model to this field making use of private sectors' capital and technological advantages. To assess the risks in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China, 44 risk factors were identified and 19 critical risks factors (CRFs) were selected and classified into 4 groups (CRGs) based on a questionnaire survey in this paper. Then, the likelihood of occurrence (LO), magnitude of impact (MI), the integrated risk level (IRL) of each CRF, CRG and the overall risk were calculated through the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The CRF "government invention" was the most critical risk factor and the CRG "project participant risk" was the most critical risk factor group. Overall, the final fuzzy synthesis result indicated that the IRL of the public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China was high. Finally, some recommendations were given for each CRF. The evaluation index system, the multi-criteria fuzzy synthetic evaluation framework, the obtained conclusions and the risk response measures in this paper can help policy makers and project decision makers make appropriate decisions and allocate the limited resources to the risks worthy more attention. Simultaneously, this paper can provide a reference for the private sector to avoid too risky project and at the same time facilitate the public sector to take effective measures reducing project risks so as to attract more high-quality private capital. In addition, the risk assessment in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects has not been discussed and paid enough attention yet. Thus, this study expands the knowledge and contributes to the literature. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk analysis of public-private partnership waste-to-energy incineration projects in China: a hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM approach
    Cheng, Min
    Liu, Lin
    Cheng, Xiaotong
    Tao, Li
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 31 (11) : 4255 - 4280
  • [42] A new rough cloud AHP method for risk evaluation of public-private partnership projects
    Song, Wenyan
    Zhu, Yue
    Zhou, Jianbo
    Chen, Zhiyu
    Zhou, Jiantao
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (04) : 2045 - 2062
  • [43] A COMPUTERIZED RISK EVALUATION MODEL FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) PROJECTS AND ITS APPLICATION
    Xu, Yelin
    Lu, Yujie
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Skibniewski, Miroslaw J.
    Yeung, John F. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 16 (03) : 277 - 297
  • [44] Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of moral hazard and adverse selection of public private partnership projects
    Owusu-Manu, De-Graft
    Kukah, Augustine Senanu Komla
    Edwards, David John
    Ameyaw, Ernest Effah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23 (11) : 1805 - 1814
  • [45] Hazard analysis on public-private partnership projects in developing Asia
    Lee, Minsoo
    Han, Xuehui
    Quising, Pilipinas F.
    Villaruel, Mai Lin
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 4 (01) : 50 - 72
  • [46] USING FUZZY ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS AND ISM METHODS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: A CHINA PERSPECTIVE
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Xinyu
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (02) : 168 - 183
  • [47] Reasons for entering into Ghanaian public-private partnership (PPP) power projects
    Kukah, Augustine Senanu Komla
    Owusu-Manu, De-Graft
    Badu, Edward
    Edwards, David John
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 22 (03) : 854 - 878
  • [48] Topic: Power relations in the finance of infrastructure public-private partnership projects
    Liu, Lucia Xiaoyan
    Clegg, Stewart
    Pollack, Julien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 40 (07) : 725 - 740
  • [49] Risk management of public-private partnership charging infrastructure projects in China based on a three-dimension framework
    Wu, Yunna
    Song, Zixin
    Li, Lingwenying
    Xu, Ruhang
    ENERGY, 2018, 165 : 1089 - 1101
  • [50] Cost Analysis of straw-based power generation in Jiangsu Province, China
    Zhang, Qin
    Zhou, Dequn
    Zhou, Peng
    Ding, Hao
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 785 - 793