Risk assessment in straw-based power generation public-private partnership projects in China: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis

被引:90
|
作者
Wu, Yunna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lingwenying [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ruhang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kaifeng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Xiaoshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
PPP mode; Straw-based power generation; Risk assessment; Fuzzy synthetic evaluation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ENERGY PROJECTS; PPP PROJECTS; ALLOCATION; MALAYSIA; SUCCESS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing requirement on energy saving, emission reduction and environmental protection in China, the straw-based power generation is developing rapidly, which can not only provide clean energy, but also address the serious environmental problems caused by farmers' burning straw directly. Currently, the government is gradually applying Public-Private-Partnership model to this field making use of private sectors' capital and technological advantages. To assess the risks in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China, 44 risk factors were identified and 19 critical risks factors (CRFs) were selected and classified into 4 groups (CRGs) based on a questionnaire survey in this paper. Then, the likelihood of occurrence (LO), magnitude of impact (MI), the integrated risk level (IRL) of each CRF, CRG and the overall risk were calculated through the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The CRF "government invention" was the most critical risk factor and the CRG "project participant risk" was the most critical risk factor group. Overall, the final fuzzy synthesis result indicated that the IRL of the public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China was high. Finally, some recommendations were given for each CRF. The evaluation index system, the multi-criteria fuzzy synthetic evaluation framework, the obtained conclusions and the risk response measures in this paper can help policy makers and project decision makers make appropriate decisions and allocate the limited resources to the risks worthy more attention. Simultaneously, this paper can provide a reference for the private sector to avoid too risky project and at the same time facilitate the public sector to take effective measures reducing project risks so as to attract more high-quality private capital. In addition, the risk assessment in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects has not been discussed and paid enough attention yet. Thus, this study expands the knowledge and contributes to the literature. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk Management at Implementation of Social Projects of Public-Private Partnership
    Shubina, V., I
    Shemyatikhina, L. Y.
    Evseeva, M., V
    Shipitsyna, K. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - FAR EAST CON (ISCFEC 2020), 2020, 128 : 2370 - 2376
  • [32] RISK-MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP INNOVATION PROJECTS
    Hrytsenko, Larysa
    Boiarko, Iryna
    Tverezovska, Oleksandra
    Polcyn, Jan
    Miskiewicz, Radoslaw
    MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS, 2021, (02): : 155 - 165
  • [33] RISK EVALUATION OF WATER CONSERVANCY IN A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT BASED ON GREY FUZZY THEORY
    Wang, Bo
    Shi, Nan
    Wang, Fuqiang
    Nie, Xiangtian
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE CONTAMINACION AMBIENTAL, 2019, 35 : 111 - 121
  • [34] Collaborative Risk Management for Public-Private Partnership Projects in Australia
    Zhang, Guomin
    Jin, XiaoHua
    Huang, Chunyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 432 - 437
  • [35] ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) PROJECTS IN INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION
    Apanaviciene, Rasa
    Rudzianskaite-Kvaraciejiene, Ruta
    MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2010, VOL I, 2010, : 356 - 364
  • [36] Equitable Financial Evaluation Method for Public-Private Partnership Projects
    柯永建
    刘新平
    王守清
    Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2008, (05) : 702 - 707
  • [37] A systematic approach for public-private partnership projects CSFs evaluation
    Wang, Liping
    Zhang, Pu
    Zhang, Pei
    Li, Rongbo
    Zhang, Yanke
    Wu, Yueqiu
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (09) : 1127 - 1145
  • [38] Evaluation Model for Assessing the Suitability of Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Cheung, Esther
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2011, 27 (02) : 80 - 89
  • [39] Effect of private capital in rival projects on public-private partnership adoption in China
    Feng, Jingbing
    Zhang, Tao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (04) : 435 - 440
  • [40] Fiscal Risk Management of Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Multidimensional Identification and Assessment Framework
    Xu, LiPing
    Liu, Ning
    Zhou, Linyu
    Lu, LanQi
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (02) : 166 - 192