Assessment of the greenhouse gas emission footprint of a biorefinery over its life cycle

被引:8
|
作者
Giwa, Temitayo [1 ]
Akbari, Maryam [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[2] Nat Resources Canada NRCan, CanmetENERGY, 1615 Lionel Boulet Blvd, Varennes, PQ J3X 1P7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Greenhouse gas emissions; Biorefinery; Life cycle assessment; Ethanol; Fermentation; Pyrolysis; FAST PYROLYSIS; PRODUCTION COST; STEAM GASIFICATION; BIOMASS; ETHANOL; CHAR; SIMULATION; RECOVERY; BIOCHAR; RESIDUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116327
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Expanding the product portfolio of a biorefinery has the potential to improve the economics of the biorefinery as it not only increases revenue but also improves valuable feedstock use. Such process improvement, however, results in added complexity, energy consumption, and emissions. This study evaluated the energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of an integrated multi-product biorefinery from a life cycle perspective. Six pathways were assessed in which the by-products of fast pyrolysis - biochar and non-condensable gases (NCGs) - were upgraded to produce ethanol and hydrogen, in addition to bio-oil. The six pathways include six corre-sponding biorefinery configurations. The configurations differ by NCG application and the kind of fuel used to supplement process heat demand. The GHG emissions intensity of the assessed pathways is between 13.54 and 43.13 gCO2eq/MJ. Our assessment shows a higher GHG emissions intensity in the assessed pathways than the base pathway, in which only bio-oil is produced. Generally, the emission intensities of biorefinery products are lower than when these products are produced from fossil sources but higher than when produced from dedicated bioenergy technologies. Also, when the products are put into an end-use application, like power generation, bio-oil shows lower life cycle GHG emissions compared to conventional fossil-based power plants. When the transportation of the products to the power plant is considered, the life cycle GHG emissions of hydrogen are higher than from the conventional generation methods. Sensitivity analyses show that reducing the feedstock moisture content and increasing ethanol titer can provide significant emission reduction potential. Outside the boundaries of the biorefineries, feedstock transportation also has an impact on the overall emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment and greenhouse gas emission evaluation from Aksaray solid waste disposal facility
    Afşın Yusuf Çetinkaya
    Levent Bilgili
    S. Levent Kuzu
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2018, 11 : 549 - 558
  • [22] Greenhouse gas emission timing in life cycle assessment and the global warming potential of perennial energy crops
    Almeida, Joana
    Degerickx, Jeroen
    Achten, Wouter M. J.
    Muys, Bart
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2015, 6 (5-6) : 185 - 195
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emission reduction through bike-sharing for sustainable cities
    Cheng, Baoquan
    Li, Jianchang
    Su, Hao
    Lu, Kun
    Chen, Huihua
    Huang, Jianling
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 53
  • [24] Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emission Studies of Jatropha Biodiesel Pathway by Life Cycle Assessment in India
    Kalaivani, K.
    Balasubramanian, N.
    INDIAN CHEMICAL ENGINEER, 2016, 58 (03) : 255 - 267
  • [25] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emission assessment for bike-sharing systems based on a rebalancing emission estimation model
    Chen, Meilin
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Zhou, Ya
    Chen, Lei
    Wan, Hang
    Li, Zhikun
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 191
  • [26] The methodology and results of using life cycle assessment to measure and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions footprint of “Major Events” at the University of Arizona
    Leah Edwards
    Jake Knight
    Robert Handler
    Joseph Abraham
    Paul Blowers
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 536 - 554
  • [27] The methodology and results of using life cycle assessment to measure and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions footprint of "Major Events" at the University of Arizona
    Edwards, Leah
    Knight, Jake
    Handler, Robert
    Abraham, Joseph
    Blowers, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (04): : 536 - 554
  • [28] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of different CO2 supply options for an algal biorefinery
    Arora, Pratham
    Chance, Ronald
    Hendrix, Howard
    Realff, Matthew J.
    Thomas, Valerie M.
    Yuan, Yanhui
    JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2020, 40
  • [29] A Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Model of a Yellow Poplar Forest Residue Reductive Catalytic Fractionation Biorefinery
    Luo, Yuqing
    O'Dea, Robert M.
    Gupta, Yagya
    Chang, Jeffrey
    Sadula, Sunitha
    Soh, Li Pei
    Robbins, Allison M.
    Levia, Delphis F.
    Vlachos, Dionisios G.
    Epps, Thomas H.
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2022, 39 (10) : 821 - 833
  • [30] Life cycle greenhouse gas emission assessment of major petroleum oil products for transport and household sectors in India
    Garg, Amit
    Vishwanathan, Saritha
    Avashia, Vidhee
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 : 38 - 48