The methodology and results of using life cycle assessment to measure and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions footprint of "Major Events" at the University of Arizona

被引:26
|
作者
Edwards, Leah [1 ]
Knight, Jake [1 ]
Handler, Robert [2 ]
Abraham, Joseph [3 ]
Blowers, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, 1133 James E Rogers Way,Room 108, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Michigan Technol Univ, 840 Dow Bldg,1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[3] Willamette Univ, 900 State St, Salem, OR 97301 USA
来源
关键词
Carbon footprint; Life cycle assessment; Sporting event; Sustainability; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1038-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In 2012 and 2013, the University of Arizona's Office of Sustainability conducted environmental life cycle assessments of two Homecoming events that drew 60,000 attendees each. Based on reviews of published literature, this is the first time that a process-based life cycle assessment has been conducted for an event of this size. This study contributes to the small but growing field of research using life cycle assessment to track the environmental impacts of events. The assessments at The University of Arizona considered the environmental impact of food, materials, waste, travel, and lodging. The effects of these components of Homecoming weekend were evaluated in terms of nine different categories. However, this paper focuses on greenhouse gas emissions. The data collection process for these assessments was completed by student observers and supplemented with information provided by university departments, event organizers, and survey responses from attendees. Data were analyzed using SimaPro Life Cycle Assessment software and using data from the EcoInvent database. Based on the results of the 2012 study, initiatives were put into place for 2013 that were designed to reduce the environmental impact of the subsequent Homecoming event. The results show that the total impact of Homecoming 2012 was an estimated 2400 metric tons of CO2-eq, whereas the impact of Homecoming 2013 was an estimated 1900 metric tons of CO2-eq, a 19 % decrease year over year. Data were analyzed in terms of carbon dioxide emissions in both years. Travel made up the majority of the environmental impact (82.04 % in 2012 and 77.77 % in 2013), followed by accommodations (17.5 % in 2012 and 19.31 % in 2013), with energy, materials, and food having almost negligible impacts (0.46 % in 2012 and 2.92 % in 2013). While there had been noticeable changes in the measured impact of food and energy between 2012 and 2013, the significant impact of travel overshadowed all other impact categories in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, making these changes less noticeable. Analysis of each of these categories of impact helped to establish best practices for mitigating the impact of events on a category-by-category basis. This study introduces a framework for assessing impacts of a large university event while also highlighting ways to reduce impacts. The initiatives implemented in 2013 to reduce impacts of large-scale events can be informative to others working to reduce emissions at large events. Additional recommendations to reduce impacts of large events are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 554
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The methodology and results of using life cycle assessment to measure and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions footprint of “Major Events” at the University of Arizona
    Leah Edwards
    Jake Knight
    Robert Handler
    Joseph Abraham
    Paul Blowers
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 536 - 554
  • [2] Impact of Power Generation Mix on Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Greenhouse Gas Results
    Marriott, Joe
    Matthews, H. Scott
    Hendrickson, Chris T.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 14 (06) : 919 - 928
  • [3] Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry
    Moresi, Mauro
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2014, 25 (03): : 53 - 62
  • [4] Assessment of the greenhouse gas emission footprint of a biorefinery over its life cycle
    Giwa, Temitayo
    Akbari, Maryam
    Kumar, Amit
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 271
  • [5] At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting
    Amma Asantewaa Agyei Boakye
    Terrie Boguski
    Sarah Cashman
    Christoph Koffler
    Ashley Kreuder
    Manish Kumar
    Naveen Kumar Vipparla
    Lisa Peterson
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 321 - 335
  • [6] Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: A life cycle assessment
    Sonne, Edie
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (04) : 1439 - 1450
  • [7] At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting
    Boakye, Amma Asantewaa Agyei
    Boguski, Terrie
    Cashman, Sarah
    Koffler, Christoph
    Kreuder, Ashley
    Kumar, Manish
    Vipparla, Naveen Kumar
    Peterson, Lisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (04): : 321 - 335
  • [8] Applying life cycle thinking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road projects
    Barandica, Jesus M.
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Gonzalo
    Berzosa, Alvaro
    Delgado, Juan A.
    Acosta, Francisco J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 57 : 79 - 91
  • [9] Optimal greenhouse gas emissions in NGCC plants integrating life cycle assessment
    Bernier, Etienne
    Marechal, Francois
    Samson, Rejean
    ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 639 - 648
  • [10] An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions
    McNamee, P.
    Adams, P. W. R.
    McManus, M. C.
    Dooley, B.
    Darvell, L. I.
    Williams, A.
    Jones, J. M.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 113 : 177 - 188