Impact of Power Generation Mix on Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Greenhouse Gas Results

被引:22
|
作者
Marriott, Joe [1 ]
Matthews, H. Scott [2 ]
Hendrickson, Chris T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
carbon emissions; electric utilities; energy footprint; energy use; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; industrial ecology;
D O I
10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00290.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
P>The mix of electricity consumed in any stage in the life cycle of a product, process, or industrial sector has a significant effect on the associated inventory of emissions and environmental impacts because of large differences in the power generation method used. Fossil-fuel-fired or nuclear-centralized steam generators; large-scale and small-scale hydroelectric power; and renewable options, such as geothermal, wind, and solar power, each have a unique set of issues that can change the results of a life cycle assessment. This article shows greenhouse gas emissions estimates for electricity purchase for different scenarios using U.S. average electricity mix, state mixes, state mixes including imports, and a sector-specific mix to show how different these results can be. We find that greenhouse gases for certain sectors and scenarios can change by more than 100%. Knowing this, practitioners should exercise caution or at least account for the uncertainty associated with mix choice.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 928
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the greenhouse gas emission footprint of a biorefinery over its life cycle
    Giwa, Temitayo
    Akbari, Maryam
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 271
  • [2] Life cycle greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas: a probabilistic approach
    Shahriar, Anjuman
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2014, 28 (08) : 2185 - 2204
  • [3] Life cycle greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas: a probabilistic approach
    Anjuman Shahriar
    Rehan Sadiq
    Solomon Tesfamariam
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014, 28 : 2185 - 2204
  • [4] How to quantify uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment: the case of greenhouse gas emissions of gas power generation in the US
    Hauck, M.
    Steinmann, Z. J. N.
    Laurenzi, I. J.
    Karuppiah, R.
    Huijbregts, M. A. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [5] Carbon footprint - A catalyst for life cycle assessment?
    Weidema, Bo P.
    Thrane, Mikkel
    Christensen, Per
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Lokke, Soren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 12 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [6] The methodology and results of using life cycle assessment to measure and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions footprint of "Major Events" at the University of Arizona
    Edwards, Leah
    Knight, Jake
    Handler, Robert
    Abraham, Joseph
    Blowers, Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (04): : 536 - 554
  • [7] The methodology and results of using life cycle assessment to measure and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions footprint of “Major Events” at the University of Arizona
    Leah Edwards
    Jake Knight
    Robert Handler
    Joseph Abraham
    Paul Blowers
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 536 - 554
  • [8] The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment
    Messagie, Maarten
    Mertens, Jan
    Oliveira, Luis
    Rangaraju, Surendraprabu
    Sanfelix, Javier
    Coosemans, Thierry
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Macharis, Cathy
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 469 - 476
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment, Estimation and Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential of New Energy Power Generation in China
    Liu Sheng-Qiang
    Mao Xian-Qiang
    Gao Yu-Bing
    Xing You-Kai
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2012, 3 (03) : 147 - 153