GATE as a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo platform for the evaluation of proton pencil beam scanning treatment plans

被引:49
|
作者
Grevillot, L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bertrand, D. [3 ]
Dessy, F. [3 ]
Freud, N. [1 ,2 ]
Sarrut, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, INSERM, INSA Lyon, CREATIS,CNRS,U1044,UMR5220, F-69365 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Lyon, Ctr Leon Berard, Lyon, France
[3] IBA, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2012年 / 57卷 / 13期
关键词
SIMULATION TOOLKIT; DOSE CALCULATION; CT NUMBERS; THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; GATE/GEANT4; ALGORITHM; WATER;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4223
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Active scanning delivery systems take full advantage of ion beams to best conform to the tumor and to spare surrounding healthy tissues; however, it is also a challenging technique for quality assurance. In this perspective, we upgraded the GATE/GEANT4 Monte Carlo platform in order to recalculate the treatment planning system (TPS) dose distributions for active scanning systems. A method that allows evaluating the TPS dose distributions with the GATE Monte Carlo platform has been developed and applied to the XiO TPS (Elekta), for the IBA proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system. First, we evaluated the specificities of each dose engine. A dose-conversion scheme that allows one to convert dose to medium into dose to water was implemented within GATE. Specific test cases in homogeneous and heterogeneous configurations allowed for the estimation of the differences between the beam models implemented in XiO and GATE. Finally, dose distributions of a prostate treatment plan were compared. In homogeneous media, a satisfactory agreement was generally obtained between XiO and GATE. The maximum stopping power difference of 3% occurred in a human tissue of 0.9 g cm(3) density and led to a significant range shift. Comparisons in heterogeneous configurations pointed out the limits of the TPS dose calculation accuracy and the superiority of Monte Carlo simulations. The necessity of computing dose to water in our Monte Carlo code for comparisons with TPSs is also presented. Finally, the new capabilities of the platform are applied to a prostate treatment plan and dose differences between both dose engines are analyzed in detail. This work presents a generic method to compare TPS dose distributions with the GATE Monte Carlo platform. It is noteworthy that GATE is also a convenient tool for imaging applications, therefore opening new research possibilities for the PBS modality.
引用
收藏
页码:4223 / 4244
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GXPS: A Geant4-based Monte Carlo code for x-ray polycapillary simulation
    Chi, Zhijun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2020, 128 (12)
  • [42] GATE: A Geant4-based simulation platform for PET and SPECT integrating movement and time management
    Santin, G
    Strul, D
    Lazaro, D
    Simon, L
    Krieguer, M
    Martins, MV
    Breton, V
    Morel, C
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2003, 50 (05) : 1516 - 1521
  • [43] Clinical validation of Monte Carlo dose calculation for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Widesott, L.
    Lorentini, S.
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Farace, P.
    Schwarz, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S45 - S46
  • [44] Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Huang, Sheng
    Kang, Minglei
    Souris, Kevin
    Ainsley, Christopher
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, James E.
    Simone, Charles B.
    Lin, Liyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 558 - 572
  • [45] An Automated Monte Carlo Based QA Framework for Pencil Beam Scanning Treatments
    Shin, J.
    Jee, K.
    Clasie, B.
    Depauw, N.
    Madden, T.
    Sharp, G.
    Paganetti, H.
    Kooy, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3685 - 3685
  • [46] Validation and Implementation of Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Nozzle Using TOPAS Monte Carlo Simulation
    Lin, C.
    Feng, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E875 - E875
  • [47] Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning
    Winterhalter, C.
    Fura, E.
    Tian, Y.
    Aitkenhead, A.
    Bolsi, A.
    Dieterle, M.
    Fredh, A.
    Meier, G.
    Oxley, D.
    Siewert, D.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A.
    Safai, S.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (17):
  • [48] Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields
    Padilla-Cabal, Fatima
    Alejandro Fragoso, Jose
    Resch, Andreas Franz
    Georg, Dietmar
    Fuchs, Hermann
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (01) : 223 - 233
  • [49] A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Huang, Sheng
    Harms, Joseph
    Zhou, Jun
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Dhabaan, Anees
    Slopsema, Roelf
    Kang, Minglei
    Liu, Tian
    McDonald, Mark
    Langen, Katja
    Lin, Liyong
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1545 - 1557
  • [50] Monte Carlo Simulations of Microdosimetry and Radiolytic Species Production for Preclinical Proton Beam Using GATE and Geant4-DNA
    Fois, G.
    Blain, G.
    Chiavassa, S.
    Delpon, G.
    Fiegel, V.
    Haddad, F.
    Koumeir, C.
    Metivier, V.
    Poirier, F.
    Potiron, V.
    Servagent, N.
    Supiot, S.
    Vandenborre, J.
    Maigne, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E406 - E406