Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS: Sustainable Approach to Technical and Economic Evaluation of Rocks for Lining Canals

被引:3
|
作者
Ali, Mahrous A. M. [1 ]
Kim, Jong-Gwan [2 ]
Awadallah, Zakaria H. [3 ]
Abdo, Ahmed M. [4 ]
Hassan, Abbas M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn Qena, Min & Petr Engn Dept, Qena 83513, Egypt
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Energy & Resources Engn, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Qena 83513, Egypt
[4] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Architecture, Qena 83513, Egypt
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 20期
关键词
TOPSIS; lining canals; watercourses; sustainable decision making; rock types; lime stone; multiple-criteria decision making; NIGERIAN CARBONATE ROCKS; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; FUZZY; LIMESTONES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/app11209692
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
One of the crucial projects underway in Egypt is the lining of watercourses to withstand the outflow of water through their beds and flanks. Various materials have been used in this project, including limestone, sandstone, basalt, and dolomite, along with other building materials. This study focused on the evaluation of rock characteristics to determine their suitability for the construction of a canal lining. All rock characteristics should be classified in terms of technical and economic concerns related to mining rock specifications, such as mechanical and physical properties, and evaluated according to their weights and ratings. As a rule of decision making, management stakeholders select the rock types. The primary purpose of canal linings is to reduce water loss due to seepage. Methodologically, we adopted the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and derived an improved TOPSIS method based on experimental testing. This study attempted the first application of TOPSIS to canal linings and relevant construction materials. The analysis shows that limestone L1 is the best rock-building material for canal linings in Upper Egypt. Limestone L1 has the shortest geometric distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest geometric distance from the negative ideal solution. The results provide decision makers with strategic indicators to select among different rock types based on the total points assigned to all rock specifications.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection mining methods via multiple criteria decision analysis using TOPSIS and modification of the UBC method
    Ali, Mahrous A. M.
    Kim, Jong-Gwan
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE MINING, 2021, 20 (02): : 49 - 55
  • [42] ESTIMATING THERAPEUTIC VALUE FOR ONCOLOGY DRUGS USING MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS AND DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT APPROACHES IN RUSSIA
    Lemeshko, V
    Musina, N. Z.
    Ratushnyak, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S672 - S672
  • [43] Developing an integrated social, economic, environmental, and technical analysis model for sustainable development using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods
    Singh, Shweta
    Upadhyay, Surya Prakash
    Powar, Satvasheel
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 308
  • [44] Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis and characterisation of phase change materials for waste heat recovery at high temperature for sustainable energy-intensive industry
    Royo, Patricia
    Ferreira, Victor J.
    Ure, Zafer
    Gledhill, Sam
    Lopez-Sabiron, Ana M.
    Ferreira, German
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 186
  • [45] Is the evaluation of the students' values possible? An integrated approach to determining the weights of students' personal goals using multiple-criteria methods
    Dadelo, Stanislav
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Kacerauskas, Tomas
    Dadeliene, Ruta
    EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2016, 12 (11) : 2771 - 2781
  • [46] Decision Support Systems Based on a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis to Promote a Whole-of-Resource Approach for Water Management, with a Case Study of Rural Bengaluru in India
    Shah, Tavseef Mairaj
    Egwu, Chidinma Onyekaozuoro
    Hammad, Mohammad
    Otterpohl, Ralf
    WATER, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [47] Enhancing Sustainable Urban Planning through GIS and Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Green Space Infrastructure in Taif Province, Saudi Arabia
    Waheeb, Sahl Abdullah
    Zerouali, Bilel
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    Alwetaishi, Mamdooh
    Wong, Yong Jie
    Bailek, Nadjem
    Alsaggaf, Ahmad Ameen
    Abd Elrahman, Sahar I. M.
    Santos, Celso Augusto Guimaraes
    Majrashi, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz
    WATER, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [48] Evaluation of sustainable acid rain control options utilizing a fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis model frame work
    Onu, Pascal U.
    Quan, Xie
    Xu, Ling
    Orji, Juliet
    Onu, Eugene
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 : 612 - 625
  • [49] 2-Tuple unbalanced linguistic multiple-criteria group decision-making using prospect theory data envelopment analysis
    Imran Khan
    Anjana Gupta
    Aparna Mehra
    Soft Computing, 2022, 26 : 6317 - 6332
  • [50] Soil wind erodibility and erosion estimation using Landsat satellite imagery and multiple-criteria decision analysis in Urmia Lake Region, Iran
    Chakherlou, Saghar
    Jafarzadeh, Ali Asghar
    Ahmadi, Abbas
    Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar
    Shahbazi, Farzin
    Boloorani, Ali Darvishi
    Mirzaei, Saham
    ARID LAND RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (01) : 71 - 91