Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS: Sustainable Approach to Technical and Economic Evaluation of Rocks for Lining Canals

被引:3
|
作者
Ali, Mahrous A. M. [1 ]
Kim, Jong-Gwan [2 ]
Awadallah, Zakaria H. [3 ]
Abdo, Ahmed M. [4 ]
Hassan, Abbas M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn Qena, Min & Petr Engn Dept, Qena 83513, Egypt
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Energy & Resources Engn, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Qena 83513, Egypt
[4] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Architecture, Qena 83513, Egypt
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 20期
关键词
TOPSIS; lining canals; watercourses; sustainable decision making; rock types; lime stone; multiple-criteria decision making; NIGERIAN CARBONATE ROCKS; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; FUZZY; LIMESTONES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/app11209692
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
One of the crucial projects underway in Egypt is the lining of watercourses to withstand the outflow of water through their beds and flanks. Various materials have been used in this project, including limestone, sandstone, basalt, and dolomite, along with other building materials. This study focused on the evaluation of rock characteristics to determine their suitability for the construction of a canal lining. All rock characteristics should be classified in terms of technical and economic concerns related to mining rock specifications, such as mechanical and physical properties, and evaluated according to their weights and ratings. As a rule of decision making, management stakeholders select the rock types. The primary purpose of canal linings is to reduce water loss due to seepage. Methodologically, we adopted the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and derived an improved TOPSIS method based on experimental testing. This study attempted the first application of TOPSIS to canal linings and relevant construction materials. The analysis shows that limestone L1 is the best rock-building material for canal linings in Upper Egypt. Limestone L1 has the shortest geometric distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest geometric distance from the negative ideal solution. The results provide decision makers with strategic indicators to select among different rock types based on the total points assigned to all rock specifications.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a Damping System for Reversible Mouldboard Plows Using Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Mandavian, Alireza
    Aghel, H.
    Minaei, S.
    Najafi, G. H.
    Zareiforoush, H.
    AMA-AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION IN ASIA AFRICA AND LATIN AMERICA, 2017, 48 (03): : 88 - 93
  • [22] Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese BanksA Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Lin, Arthur Jin
    Chang, Hai-Yen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [23] Selection of the Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development: A Case Study of Poland
    Trojanowska, Malgorzata
    Necka, Krzysztof
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
  • [24] Project Portfolio Selection Considering Return-risk Evaluation and Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Barucke Marcondes, Guilherme Augusto
    ICORES: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, 2019, : 264 - 269
  • [25] Comparative Survey of Association Rule Mining Algorithms based on Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis approach
    Addi, Ait-Mlouk
    Tarik, Agouti
    Fatima, Gharnati
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, ENGINEERING & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (CEIT 2015), 2015,
  • [26] Evaluation of Jining mining subsidence susceptibility based on three multiple-criteria decision analysis methods
    Cui, Hao
    Ma, Chuanming
    Tan, Xianfeng
    Chen, Hongnian
    Hu, Bo
    Xu, Shuming
    Tan, Xiuquan
    Zhang, Yan
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [27] Location Selection for Reusable Waste Collection Center using the Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Technique (TOPSIS): Case of Sehremini
    Maden, Serhan
    Kaya, Hasan Serdar
    5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 572 - 578
  • [28] Implementation of Sustainable Supply Chain Management considering Barriers and Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis in the Healthcare Industry
    Karbassi Yazdi, Amir
    Wanke, Peter
    Ghandvar, Maryam
    Hajili, Marjan
    Mehdikarami, Mousa
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [29] Multiple-criteria decision analysis process by using prospect decision theory in interval-valued neutrosophic environment
    Veerappan, Chinnadurai
    Albert, Bobin
    CAAI TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 5 (03) : 209 - 221
  • [30] MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING INCLUDING QUALITATIVE FACTORS - THE POST-MODEL ANALYSIS APPROACH
    LEE, JK
    HURST, EG
    DECISION SCIENCES, 1988, 19 (02) : 334 - 352