An experimental investigation of bilateral oligopoly in emissions trading markets

被引:7
|
作者
Tanaka, Kenta [1 ]
Matsukawa, Isamu [1 ]
Managi, Shunsuke [2 ]
机构
[1] Musashi Univ, Nerima Ku, 1-26-1 Toyotamakami, Tokyo 1768534, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Urban Inst, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Laboratory experiment; Bilateral oligopoly; Emissions trading; Market power; POLLUTION PERMIT MARKETS; PRIVATE INFORMATION; POWER; EQUILIBRIA; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101349
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Market power in emissions trading has been extensively investigated because emerging markets for tradable emissions permits, such as the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), can be dominated by relatively few large sellers or buyers. Previous studies on market power in emissions trading have assumed the existence of a subset of competitive players. However, a key feature of emissions trading markets is that emissions permits are often traded by a small number of large sellers and buyers. Using a laboratory experiment, our objective in this paper is to test the performance of an emissions trading market utilizing a double auction in a bilateral oligopoly. Our results suggest that the theoretical bilateral oligopoly models can better describe market outcomes of emissions trading. The effects of the slope of the marginal abatement cost function on market power in laboratory experiments are found to be consistent with those predicted by the theoretical bilateral oligopoly model. How market power is exercised depends on the curvature of the abatement cost function. If the marginal abatement cost function of buyers (sellers) is less steep than that of sellers (buyers), the price of permits is lower (higher) than that under perfect competition. This is because the market power of buyers (sellers) exceeds that of sellers (buyers). The price of permits is close to the perfect competitive price when all traders have the sameslope of the marginal abatement cost function.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BILATERAL OLIGOPOLY IN POLLUTION PERMIT MARKETS: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
    Schnier, Kurt
    Doyle, Martin
    Rigby, James R.
    Yates, Andrew J.
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2014, 52 (03) : 1060 - 1079
  • [2] Unit Commitment for Combined Pool/Bilateral Markets with Emissions Trading
    Kockar, Ivana
    [J]. 2008 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 4637 - 4645
  • [3] Dynamic Efficiency in Experimental Emissions Trading Markets with Investment Uncertainty
    Timothy N. Cason
    Frans P. de Vries
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2019, 73 : 1 - 31
  • [4] Dynamic Efficiency in Experimental Emissions Trading Markets with Investment Uncertainty
    Cason, Timothy N.
    de Vries, Frans P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 73 (01): : 1 - 31
  • [5] Bilateral oligopoly -: The efficiency of intermediate goods markets
    Bjornerstedt, Jonas
    Stennek, Johan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2007, 25 (05) : 884 - 907
  • [6] Bilateral Oligopoly, Private Information, and Pollution Permit Markets
    Malueg, David A.
    Yates, Andrew J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 43 (04): : 553 - 572
  • [7] Bilateral Oligopoly, Private Information, and Pollution Permit Markets
    David A. Malueg
    Andrew J. Yates
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 43 : 553 - 572
  • [8] Emissions trading in regulated electricity markets
    Acworth, William
    de Oca, Mariza Montes
    Boute, Anatole
    Piantieri, Carlotta
    Matthes, Felix Christian
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 (01) : 60 - 70
  • [9] Trading Agricultural Payment Entitlements: An Experimental Investigation of Bilateral Negotiations
    Bahrs, Enno
    Kroll, Stephan
    Sutter, Matthias
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (05) : 1201 - 1207
  • [10] SOME CONSEQUENCES OF BILATERAL OLIGOPOLY AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION IN BREAD MARKETS
    WALSH, RG
    EVANS, BM
    BIRCH, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1964, 46 (01): : 161 - 172