An experimental investigation of bilateral oligopoly in emissions trading markets

被引:7
|
作者
Tanaka, Kenta [1 ]
Matsukawa, Isamu [1 ]
Managi, Shunsuke [2 ]
机构
[1] Musashi Univ, Nerima Ku, 1-26-1 Toyotamakami, Tokyo 1768534, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Urban Inst, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Laboratory experiment; Bilateral oligopoly; Emissions trading; Market power; POLLUTION PERMIT MARKETS; PRIVATE INFORMATION; POWER; EQUILIBRIA; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101349
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Market power in emissions trading has been extensively investigated because emerging markets for tradable emissions permits, such as the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), can be dominated by relatively few large sellers or buyers. Previous studies on market power in emissions trading have assumed the existence of a subset of competitive players. However, a key feature of emissions trading markets is that emissions permits are often traded by a small number of large sellers and buyers. Using a laboratory experiment, our objective in this paper is to test the performance of an emissions trading market utilizing a double auction in a bilateral oligopoly. Our results suggest that the theoretical bilateral oligopoly models can better describe market outcomes of emissions trading. The effects of the slope of the marginal abatement cost function on market power in laboratory experiments are found to be consistent with those predicted by the theoretical bilateral oligopoly model. How market power is exercised depends on the curvature of the abatement cost function. If the marginal abatement cost function of buyers (sellers) is less steep than that of sellers (buyers), the price of permits is lower (higher) than that under perfect competition. This is because the market power of buyers (sellers) exceeds that of sellers (buyers). The price of permits is close to the perfect competitive price when all traders have the sameslope of the marginal abatement cost function.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of High-Frequency Trading in Experimental Markets
    Berger, Nathanael
    DeSantis, Mark
    Porter, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTING, 2020, 29 (04): : 7 - 18
  • [42] Pollution in strategic multilateral exchange: Taxing emissions or trading on permit markets?
    Julien, Ludovic A.
    Kabre, Anicet
    de Mesnard, Louis
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2023, 75 (03) : 717 - 741
  • [43] Concurrent trading in two experimental markets with demand interdependence
    Arlington W. Williams
    Vernon L. Smith
    John O. Ledyard
    Steven Gjerstad
    [J]. Economic Theory, 2000, 16 (3) : 511 - 528
  • [44] Greed and Individual Trading Behavior in Experimental Asset Markets
    Hoyer, Karlijn
    Zeisberger, Stefan
    Breugelmans, Seger M.
    Zeelenberg, Marcel
    [J]. DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2021, 8 (02): : 80 - 96
  • [45] Concurrent trading in two experimental markets with demand interdependence
    Williams, AW
    Smith, VL
    Ledyard, JO
    Gjerstad, S
    [J]. ECONOMIC THEORY, 2000, 16 (03) : 511 - 528
  • [46] How Noise Trading Affects Markets: An Experimental Analysis
    Bloomfield, Robert
    O'Hara, Maureen
    Saar, Gideon
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (06): : 2275 - 2302
  • [47] OLIGOPOLY IN MARKETS WITH A CONTINUUM OF TRADERS
    SHITOVIT.B
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1970, 38 (04) : 58 - &
  • [48] Variable pricing in oligopoly markets
    Bass, Frank
    Haruvy, Ernan
    Prasad, Ashutosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2006, 79 (06): : 2789 - 2809
  • [49] OLIGOPOLY IN MARKETS WITH A CONTINUUM OF TRADERS
    SHITOVITZ, B
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (03) : 467 - 501
  • [50] Mixed bundling in oligopoly markets
    Zhou, Jidong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2021, 194