An experimental investigation of bilateral oligopoly in emissions trading markets

被引:7
|
作者
Tanaka, Kenta [1 ]
Matsukawa, Isamu [1 ]
Managi, Shunsuke [2 ]
机构
[1] Musashi Univ, Nerima Ku, 1-26-1 Toyotamakami, Tokyo 1768534, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Urban Inst, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Laboratory experiment; Bilateral oligopoly; Emissions trading; Market power; POLLUTION PERMIT MARKETS; PRIVATE INFORMATION; POWER; EQUILIBRIA; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101349
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Market power in emissions trading has been extensively investigated because emerging markets for tradable emissions permits, such as the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), can be dominated by relatively few large sellers or buyers. Previous studies on market power in emissions trading have assumed the existence of a subset of competitive players. However, a key feature of emissions trading markets is that emissions permits are often traded by a small number of large sellers and buyers. Using a laboratory experiment, our objective in this paper is to test the performance of an emissions trading market utilizing a double auction in a bilateral oligopoly. Our results suggest that the theoretical bilateral oligopoly models can better describe market outcomes of emissions trading. The effects of the slope of the marginal abatement cost function on market power in laboratory experiments are found to be consistent with those predicted by the theoretical bilateral oligopoly model. How market power is exercised depends on the curvature of the abatement cost function. If the marginal abatement cost function of buyers (sellers) is less steep than that of sellers (buyers), the price of permits is lower (higher) than that under perfect competition. This is because the market power of buyers (sellers) exceeds that of sellers (buyers). The price of permits is close to the perfect competitive price when all traders have the sameslope of the marginal abatement cost function.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arbitrage opportunities and feedback trading in emissions and energy markets
    Chau, Frankie
    Kuo, Jing-Ming
    Shi, Yukun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2015, 36 : 130 - 147
  • [22] Emissions Trading with Offset Markets and Free Quota Allocations
    Rosendahl, Knut Einar
    Strand, Jon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 61 (02): : 243 - 271
  • [23] Emissions Trading with Offset Markets and Free Quota Allocations
    Knut Einar Rosendahl
    Jon Strand
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2015, 61 : 243 - 271
  • [24] Impacts of Emissions Trading on Power Industries and Electricity Markets
    Xun, Binbin
    Wen, Fushuan
    MacGill, Iain
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 4527 - +
  • [25] Trading sulphur emissions in europe: "Guided bilateral trade'
    Kruitwagen, S
    Folmer, H
    Hendrix, E
    Hordijk, L
    van Ierland, E
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 16 (04): : 423 - 441
  • [26] Trading Sulphur Emissions in Europe: `Guided Bilateral Trade'
    S. Kruitwagen
    H. Folmer
    E. Hendrix
    L. Hordijk
    E. van Ierland
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 16 : 423 - 441
  • [27] Optimal bidding strategies in oligopoly markets considering bilateral contracts and transmission constraints
    Badri, A.
    Jadid, S.
    Rashidinejad, M.
    Moghaddam, M. P.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2008, 78 (06) : 1089 - 1098
  • [28] Market power in emissions trading markets ruled by a Multiple Unit Double Auction: Further experimental evidence
    Sturm, Bodo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 40 (04): : 467 - 487
  • [29] Market Power in Emissions Trading Markets Ruled by a Multiple Unit Double Auction: Further Experimental Evidence
    Bodo Sturm
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2008, 40 : 467 - 487
  • [30] Experimental tests of water quality trading markets
    Jones, Luke R.
    Vossler, Christian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 68 (03) : 449 - 462