Identification of Gleason Pattern 5 on Prostatic Needle Core Biopsy: Frequency of Underdiagnosis and Relation to Morphology

被引:6
|
作者
Fajardo, Daniel A. [1 ]
Miyamoto, Hiroshi [1 ]
Miller, Jeremy S. [1 ]
Lee, Thomas K. [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
prostate; needle biopsy; Gleason grade; Gleason score; radical prostatectomy; INTEROBSERVER REPRODUCIBILITY; PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS; CANCER; CARCINOMA; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0b013e318228571d
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The presence of a Gleason pattern 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma is associated with a worse outcome. This study assesses the accuracy of grading a tumor as having Gleason pattern 5 and the potential factors contributing to its undergrading. From the consultation service of one of the authors, we identified 59 consecutive needle biopsy cases comprising 138 parts that, upon review, were graded as having Gleason pattern 5. All cases were reported as the final diagnosis by the outside pathologist. They were sent for a second opinion at the behest of clinicians or patients and not because the pathologist was seeking a second opinion. Considering the highest Gleason score in a given multicore specimen as the overall Gleason score, Gleason pattern 5 was missed in 34 of 59 (57.6%) cases by the outside pathologist. Compared with the outside pathologist's diagnosis, the Gleason score rendered at the second opinion was increased in 101 of 138 (73.2%) parts, was decreased in 5 of 138 (3.6%) parts, and remained unchanged in 32 of 138 (23.2%) parts. Gleason pattern 5 was not identified by the initiating pathologist in 67 of 138 (48.6%) of the evaluated parts. The architectural patterns of pattern 5 were as follows: single cells (n = 104, 75.3%); solid sheets (n = 69, 50%); cords (n = 62, 44.9%); and comedonecrosis (n = 3, 2.2%). Pattern 5 was missed more frequently when it was not the primary pattern. The most common Gleason pattern 5 architectural type was single cells and the least common was comedonecrosis. None of the architectural patterns appeared to be more correctly identified than the others; however, the most accurate grading was when the primary pattern was 5 and was composed mostly of solid sheets. Owing to the important prognostic and therapeutic implications of Gleason pattern 5, pathologists must be attuned to its varied patterns and to the fact that it may often represent a secondary or tertiary component of the carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:1706 / 1711
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantifying Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Prostate Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study
    Li, Jianhong
    Li, Jianbo
    Amin, Ali
    Bhalla, Ritu
    Das, Kasturi
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Lee, Peng
    Matoso, Andres
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Mendrinos, Savvas
    Tian, Wei
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    Shah, Rajal
    Zhou, Ming
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 246A - 246A
  • [42] Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate
    Gonzalgo, ML
    Bastian, PJ
    Mangold, LA
    Trock, BJ
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (01) : 115 - 119
  • [43] EFFECT OF TUMOR VOLUME AND PRESENCE OF GLEASON PATTERN 3 IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITH GLEASON SCORE 8 ON PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY
    Ginsburg, Kevin
    Silverman, Michael
    Livingstone, Joan
    Smith, Daryn
    Heilbrun, Lance
    Cher, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E705 - E705
  • [44] Significance of Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 at Needle Biopsy in Predicting Final Gleason Score and Correlation with Pathologic Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy
    Jamal, Mohsin
    Williamson, Sean R.
    Diaz-Insua, Mireya
    Menon, Mani
    Stricker, Hans
    Peabody, James
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Gupta, Nilesh S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 : 240A - 240A
  • [45] TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC BIOPSY - IMPROVEMENT IN SENSITIVITY WITH COMBINED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION AND BIOPTY CORE BIOPSY TECHNIQUES
    ANGERMEIER, I
    JONES, J
    HAGGARD, K
    FOSTER, R
    EBLE, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1991, 64 (01) : A43 - A43
  • [46] Errors in histological grading by prostatic needle biopsy specimens: frequency and predisposing factors
    Ruijter, E
    van Leenders, G
    Miller, G
    Debruyne, F
    van de Kaa, C
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2000, 192 (02): : 229 - 233
  • [47] GLEASON HISTOLOGIC GRADING IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - CORRELATION OF 18-GAUGE CORE BIOPSY WITH PROSTATECTOMY
    SPIRES, SE
    CIBULL, ML
    WOOD, DP
    MILLER, S
    SPIRES, SM
    BANKS, ER
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1994, 118 (07) : 705 - 708
  • [48] Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, Ali
    Partin, Alan
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04): : 1286 - 1290
  • [49] Can Large Prostatic Glands be Malignant? The Perils of Diagnosing Pseudohyperplastic Variant of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Core Needle Biopsy
    Grace, Chelestes Lee
    Honda, Stacey A. A.
    Uyehara-Lock, Jane H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 138 : A105 - A105
  • [50] Prostatic needle core biopsy for diagnosis of adenocarcinoma: Are three initial levels essential? An audit
    McGrath, Stephen
    Desai, Sudha
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2006, 210 : 48 - 48