Identification of Gleason Pattern 5 on Prostatic Needle Core Biopsy: Frequency of Underdiagnosis and Relation to Morphology

被引:6
|
作者
Fajardo, Daniel A. [1 ]
Miyamoto, Hiroshi [1 ]
Miller, Jeremy S. [1 ]
Lee, Thomas K. [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
prostate; needle biopsy; Gleason grade; Gleason score; radical prostatectomy; INTEROBSERVER REPRODUCIBILITY; PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS; CANCER; CARCINOMA; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0b013e318228571d
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The presence of a Gleason pattern 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma is associated with a worse outcome. This study assesses the accuracy of grading a tumor as having Gleason pattern 5 and the potential factors contributing to its undergrading. From the consultation service of one of the authors, we identified 59 consecutive needle biopsy cases comprising 138 parts that, upon review, were graded as having Gleason pattern 5. All cases were reported as the final diagnosis by the outside pathologist. They were sent for a second opinion at the behest of clinicians or patients and not because the pathologist was seeking a second opinion. Considering the highest Gleason score in a given multicore specimen as the overall Gleason score, Gleason pattern 5 was missed in 34 of 59 (57.6%) cases by the outside pathologist. Compared with the outside pathologist's diagnosis, the Gleason score rendered at the second opinion was increased in 101 of 138 (73.2%) parts, was decreased in 5 of 138 (3.6%) parts, and remained unchanged in 32 of 138 (23.2%) parts. Gleason pattern 5 was not identified by the initiating pathologist in 67 of 138 (48.6%) of the evaluated parts. The architectural patterns of pattern 5 were as follows: single cells (n = 104, 75.3%); solid sheets (n = 69, 50%); cords (n = 62, 44.9%); and comedonecrosis (n = 3, 2.2%). Pattern 5 was missed more frequently when it was not the primary pattern. The most common Gleason pattern 5 architectural type was single cells and the least common was comedonecrosis. None of the architectural patterns appeared to be more correctly identified than the others; however, the most accurate grading was when the primary pattern was 5 and was composed mostly of solid sheets. Owing to the important prognostic and therapeutic implications of Gleason pattern 5, pathologists must be attuned to its varied patterns and to the fact that it may often represent a secondary or tertiary component of the carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:1706 / 1711
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors
    Meliti, Abdelrazak
    Sadimin, Evita
    Diolombi, Mario
    Khani, Francesca
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (06): : 681 - 685
  • [22] Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A correlation study
    Awang, Asmawiza
    Isa, Nurismah Md
    Yunus, Rosna
    Shah, Shamsul Azhar
    Pauzi, Suria Hayati Md
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 41 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [23] Correlation of Gleason scores between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma
    Sezgin, Arsenal
    Postaci, Hakan
    Eliyatkin, Nuket
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2007, 451 (02) : 350 - 351
  • [24] Is There a Concordance Between the Gleason Scores of Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Prostatic Carsinoma?
    Ozgor, Faruk
    Kucuktopcu, Onur
    Sahan, Murat
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Berberoglu, Ahmet Yalcin
    Sarilar, Omer
    Savun, Metin
    Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2016, 54 (01): : 32 - 35
  • [25] Acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate: Gleason pattern 4 quantification and morphology in needle biopsy and their relationship with findings in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Athartazio, D.
    da Silva, M. T.
    do Amaral, M. E. Pompeu
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S222 - S222
  • [26] Relation of Primary Gleason Pattern 3 or 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy to Pathological Stage and Progression after Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, A.
    Epstein, J. I.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 189A - 189A
  • [27] Comparison between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy samples in assessing Gleason score and modified Gleason score in prostatic adenocarcinomas
    Dogan Gun, Banu
    Bektas, Sibel
    Bahadir, Burak
    Mungan, Aydin
    Ozdamar, Sukru Oguz
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2007, 23 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [28] Relation of Primary Gleason Pattern 3 or 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy to Pathological Stage and Progression after Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, A.
    Epstein, J. I.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 189A - 189A
  • [29] Minute foci of gleason score 8-10 on prostatic needle biopsy - A morphologic analysis
    Fine, SW
    Epstein, JI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (07) : 962 - 968
  • [30] Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological outcomes in Gleason 7 tumors
    Grober, ED
    Nam, RK
    Sweet, JM
    Evans, AJ
    Jewett, MAS
    Trachtenberg, J
    Robinette, M
    Tsihlias, J
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 228 - 228