Identification of Gleason Pattern 5 on Prostatic Needle Core Biopsy: Frequency of Underdiagnosis and Relation to Morphology

被引:6
|
作者
Fajardo, Daniel A. [1 ]
Miyamoto, Hiroshi [1 ]
Miller, Jeremy S. [1 ]
Lee, Thomas K. [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
prostate; needle biopsy; Gleason grade; Gleason score; radical prostatectomy; INTEROBSERVER REPRODUCIBILITY; PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS; CANCER; CARCINOMA; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0b013e318228571d
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The presence of a Gleason pattern 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma is associated with a worse outcome. This study assesses the accuracy of grading a tumor as having Gleason pattern 5 and the potential factors contributing to its undergrading. From the consultation service of one of the authors, we identified 59 consecutive needle biopsy cases comprising 138 parts that, upon review, were graded as having Gleason pattern 5. All cases were reported as the final diagnosis by the outside pathologist. They were sent for a second opinion at the behest of clinicians or patients and not because the pathologist was seeking a second opinion. Considering the highest Gleason score in a given multicore specimen as the overall Gleason score, Gleason pattern 5 was missed in 34 of 59 (57.6%) cases by the outside pathologist. Compared with the outside pathologist's diagnosis, the Gleason score rendered at the second opinion was increased in 101 of 138 (73.2%) parts, was decreased in 5 of 138 (3.6%) parts, and remained unchanged in 32 of 138 (23.2%) parts. Gleason pattern 5 was not identified by the initiating pathologist in 67 of 138 (48.6%) of the evaluated parts. The architectural patterns of pattern 5 were as follows: single cells (n = 104, 75.3%); solid sheets (n = 69, 50%); cords (n = 62, 44.9%); and comedonecrosis (n = 3, 2.2%). Pattern 5 was missed more frequently when it was not the primary pattern. The most common Gleason pattern 5 architectural type was single cells and the least common was comedonecrosis. None of the architectural patterns appeared to be more correctly identified than the others; however, the most accurate grading was when the primary pattern was 5 and was composed mostly of solid sheets. Owing to the important prognostic and therapeutic implications of Gleason pattern 5, pathologists must be attuned to its varied patterns and to the fact that it may often represent a secondary or tertiary component of the carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:1706 / 1711
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of modified Gleason grading on the score concordance between the Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in prostatic carcinoma
    Ozok, Hakki Ugur
    Oktay, Murat
    Sagnak, Levent
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Ersoy, Hamit
    Alper, Murat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 36 (04): : 333 - 338
  • [32] Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations
    Zhou, Ming
    Li, Jianbo
    Cheng, Liang
    Egevad, Lars
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Kunju, Lakshmi Priya
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Mehra, Rohit
    Mendrinos, Savvas
    Osunkoya, Adeboye O.
    Paner, Gladell
    Shen, Steve S.
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    Trpkov, Kiril
    Tian, Wei
    Yang, Ximing
    Shah, Rajal B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 39 (10) : 1331 - 1339
  • [33] Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathological outcomes among men with Gleason 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate
    Gonzalgo, ML
    Bastian, PJ
    Mangold, LA
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 271 - 271
  • [35] Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies:: Is there a relation to core number and sampling region?
    Paul, R
    Schöler, S
    van Randenborgh, H
    Kübler, H
    Alschibaja, M
    Busch, R
    Hartung, R
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (04) : 450 - 455
  • [36] Gleason pattern 4 with cribriform morphology on biopsy is associated with adverse clinicopathological findings on prostatectomy
    Haffner, Michael
    Salles, Daniela Correia
    Gao, George
    Epstein, Jonathan
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [37] Quantifying Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Prostate Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study
    Li, Jianhong
    Li, Jianbo
    Amin, Ali
    Bhalla, Ritu
    Das, Kasturi
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Lee, Peng
    Matoso, Andres
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Mendrinos, Savvas
    Tian, Wei
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    Shah, Rajal
    Zhou, Ming
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 : 246A - 246A
  • [38] THE VALUE OF FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA, IN COMPARISON WITH CORE BIOPSY HISTOLOGY
    BRUINS, JL
    NIJEHOLT, AABLA
    BEEKHUISBRUSSEE, JAM
    KRAMER, AEJL
    VANKRIEKEN, JHJM
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 7 (01) : 22 - 26
  • [39] Significance of Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 at Needle Biopsy in Predicting Final Gleason Score and Correlation with Pathologic Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy
    Jamal, Mohsin
    Williamson, Sean R.
    Diaz-Insua, Mireya
    Menon, Mani
    Stricker, Hans
    Peabody, James
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Gupta, Nilesh S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 240A - 240A
  • [40] Gleason pattern 4 with cribriform morphology on biopsy is associated with adverse clinicopathological findings on prostatectomy
    Haffner, Michael
    Salles, Daniela Correia
    Gao, George
    Epstein, Jonathan
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32