Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties

被引:35
|
作者
Dinges, Eric [1 ]
Felderman, Nicole [1 ]
McGuire, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Brandie [1 ]
Bhatia, Sudershan [1 ,2 ]
Mott, Sarah [2 ]
Buatti, John [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dongxu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiat Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Holden Comprehens Canc Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Bone marrow sparing; Cervical cancer; Proton; Robustness; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; INTER-FRACTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; PROSTATE; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTORS; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: This study evaluates the potential efficacy and robustness of functional bone marrow sparing (BMS) using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for cervical cancer, with the goal of reducing hematologic toxicity. Material and methods: IMPT plans with prescription dose of 45 Gy were generated for ten patients who have received BMS intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMRT). Functional bone marrow was identified by F-18-flourothymidine positron emission tomography. IMPT plans were designed to minimize the volume of functional bone marrow receiving 5-40 Gy while maintaining similar target coverage and healthy organ sparing as IMRT. IMPT robustness was analyzed with +/- 3% range uncertainty errors and/or +/- 3 mm translational setup errors in all three principal dimensions. Results: In the static scenario, the median dose volume reductions for functional bone marrow by IMPT were: 32% for V-5Gy, 47% for V-10Gy, 54% for V-20Gy, and 57% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01 compared to IMRT. With assumed errors, even the worst-case reductions by IMPT were: 23% for V-5Gy, 37% for V-10Gy, 41% for V-20Gy, and 39% for V-40Gy, all with p < 0.01. Conclusions: The potential sparing of functional bone marrow by IMPT for cervical cancer is significant and robust under realistic systematic range uncertainties and clinically relevant setup errors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Dosimetric Analysis of Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy with Bone Marrow Sparing for Cervical Cancer
    Murakami, Naoya
    Okamoto, Hiroyuki
    Kasamatsu, Takahiro
    Kobayashi, Kazuma
    Harada, Ken
    Kitaguchi, Mayuka
    Sekii, Shuhei
    Takahashi, Kana
    Yoshio, Kotaro
    Inaba, Koji
    Morota, Madoka
    Sumi, Minako
    Toita, Takafumi
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Itami, Jun
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (09) : 5091 - 5098
  • [2] Robustness and Organ Sparing Potential of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer
    van der Laan, H. P.
    Anakotta, M.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    Dieters, M.
    Ubbels, J. F.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Both, S.
    Muijs, C.
    Knopf, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : S56 - S57
  • [3] Robustness and organ sparing potential of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer
    Van der Laan, H. P.
    Anakotta, R. M.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    Dieters, M.
    Ubbels, J. F.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Muijs, C. T.
    Knopf, A. C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1038 - S1039
  • [4] Which Bone Marrow Sparing Strategy and Radiotherapy Technology Is Most Beneficial in Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Patients With Cervical Cancer?
    Yu, De-Yang
    Bai, Yan-Ling
    Feng, Yue
    Wang, Le
    Yun, Wei-Kang
    Li, Xin
    Song, Jia-Yu
    Yang, Shan-Shan
    Zhang, Yun-Yan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [5] Bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy versus conventional techniques in cervical cancer patients
    Aydogan, B.
    Ahn, K.
    Tiryaki, H.
    Kochanski, J.
    Mundt, A. J.
    Roeske, J. C.
    Mell, L. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S401 - S401
  • [6] ATLAS-Based Active Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer
    Li, N.
    Noticewala, S. S.
    Williamson, C. W.
    Shen, H.
    Sirak, I.
    Tarnawski, R. R.
    Mahantshetty, U. M.
    Moore, K. L.
    Mell, L. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S98 - S99
  • [7] Feasibility of atlas-based active bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy for cervical cancer
    Li, Nan
    Noticewala, Sonal S.
    Williamson, Casey W.
    Shen, Hanjie
    Sirak, Igor
    Tarnawski, Rafal
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Hoh, Carl K.
    Moore, Kevin L.
    Mell, Loren K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [8] Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (10): : 2755 - 2773
  • [9] Bone Marrow Sparing by Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy in Postoperative Irradiation of Gynecologic Malignancies
    Wark, Antje
    Gupta, Anil
    Meixner, Eva
    Koenig, Laila
    Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane
    Forster, Tobias
    Lang, Kristin
    Ellerbrock, Malte
    Herfarth, Klaus
    Debus, Juergen
    Arians, Nathalie
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [10] Pelvic Bone Marrow Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Reduces the Bone Mineral Density Loss of Patients With Cervical Cancer
    Huang, Jin
    Gao, Jianyao
    Zhang, Fan
    Gu, Fei
    Ding, Silu
    Yang, Qingyu
    Bai, Yanfeng
    Li, Guang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2025, 121 (01): : 107 - 117