Risk-Informed Requirements for Design and Assessment of Structures Under Temporary Use

被引:7
|
作者
Hingorani, Ramon [1 ]
Tanner, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Ciencias Construcc Eduardo Torroja, Calle Serrano Galvache, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Acceptance criteria; collapse; risks to persons; structural reliability; temporary use; RELIABILITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1111/risa.13322
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The relatively high failure rates, with important consequences in many cases, suggest that the implicitly acceptable risk levels corresponding to temporary civil engineering structures and activities might exceed the bounds of normally acceptable levels associated with different societal activities. Among other reasons, this may be attributed to the lack of a rational approach for the assessment of risks associated with the different technologies supporting these activities in general, and for structures in particular. There is a need for establishing appropriate target reliability levels for structures under temporary use taking into account specific circumstances such as reduced risk exposure times. This issue is being addressed in this article. Acceptance criteria for building-structure-related risks to persons obtained in prior studies are adapted to the special circumstances of nonpermanent risk exposure. Thereby, the general principle followed is to maintain the same risk levels per time unit as for permanently occupied buildings. The adaptation is based on the statistical annual fatality rate, a life safety risk metric that allows for a consistent comparison of risks across different societal activities and technologies. It is shown that the target reliability indices taking account of the temporary use of buildings might be significantly higher than the values suggested for permanently used structures.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 82
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of risk assessment: Risk-informed regulations and requirements for severe accident and risk assessment research
    Chakraborty, S
    Khatib-Rahbar, M
    [J]. ATW-INTERNATIONALE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KERNENERGIE, 2000, 45 (10): : 615 - +
  • [2] Outlook for risk assessment and risk-informed regulations
    Chakraborty, S
    Breutel, C
    Khatih-Rahbar, M
    [J]. PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2017 - 2023
  • [3] Quantitative Risk-Informed Design of Levees
    Sibley, Heather M.
    Vroman, Noah D.
    Shewbridge, Scott E.
    [J]. GEO-RISK 2017: IMPACT OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY, PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION, AND GEOHAZARDS, 2017, (284): : 76 - 90
  • [4] Risk-informed design and safety assessment of structures in a changing climate: a review of US practice and a path forward
    Ghosn, Michel
    Ellingwood, Bruce R.
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2024, 20 (7-8) : 1159 - 1173
  • [5] Applications of tool support for risk-informed requirements reasoning
    Feather, MS
    Cornford, SL
    Hicks, KA
    Johnson, KR
    [J]. COMPUTER SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 20 (01): : 5 - 17
  • [6] Risk-Informed Design of RCC Dams under Extreme Seismic Loading
    Ferguson, Keith A.
    [J]. WATER, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [7] Risk-Informed Performance Assessment of Construction Projects
    Papanikolaou, Merkourios
    Xenidis, Yiannis
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (13)
  • [8] Risk-informed assessment of degraded containment vessels
    Petti, Jason P.
    Spencer, Benjamin W.
    Graves, Herman L., III
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2008, 238 (08) : 2038 - 2047
  • [9] THE USE OF RISK-INFORMED INSPECTION APPROACHES OF UKRAINE
    Hryshchenko, Bohdan
    Polianskyi, Mykhailo
    Nosovskyy, Anatoliy
    Sevbo, Oleksandr
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2013, VOL 6, 2014,
  • [10] A Risk-Informed Interference Assessment of MetSat/LTE Coexistence
    De Vries, J. Pierre
    Livnat, Uri
    Tonkin, Susan P.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 6290 - 6313