Risk-Informed Requirements for Design and Assessment of Structures Under Temporary Use

被引:7
|
作者
Hingorani, Ramon [1 ]
Tanner, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Ciencias Construcc Eduardo Torroja, Calle Serrano Galvache, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Acceptance criteria; collapse; risks to persons; structural reliability; temporary use; RELIABILITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1111/risa.13322
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The relatively high failure rates, with important consequences in many cases, suggest that the implicitly acceptable risk levels corresponding to temporary civil engineering structures and activities might exceed the bounds of normally acceptable levels associated with different societal activities. Among other reasons, this may be attributed to the lack of a rational approach for the assessment of risks associated with the different technologies supporting these activities in general, and for structures in particular. There is a need for establishing appropriate target reliability levels for structures under temporary use taking into account specific circumstances such as reduced risk exposure times. This issue is being addressed in this article. Acceptance criteria for building-structure-related risks to persons obtained in prior studies are adapted to the special circumstances of nonpermanent risk exposure. Thereby, the general principle followed is to maintain the same risk levels per time unit as for permanently occupied buildings. The adaptation is based on the statistical annual fatality rate, a life safety risk metric that allows for a consistent comparison of risks across different societal activities and technologies. It is shown that the target reliability indices taking account of the temporary use of buildings might be significantly higher than the values suggested for permanently used structures.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 82
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk-informed assessment of the technical specifications of PWR RPS instrumentation
    Papazoglou, IA
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 130 (03) : 329 - 350
  • [22] Risk-Informed Assessment of Climate Change by Considering Deterioration and Hazards
    Li, Y. H.
    Dong, Y.
    [J]. MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, RISK, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGES, 2018, : 1666 - 1671
  • [23] A RISK-INFORMED ASSESSMENT OF ASME SECTION XI, APPENDIX E
    Gamble, Ronald
    Server, William
    Bishop, Bruce
    Palm, Nathan
    Heinecke, Carol
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP 2011, VOL 6, A AND B, 2012, : 941 - 954
  • [24] A new importance assessment method for risk-informed SSC categorization
    Wang Jiaqun
    Wang Fang
    Wang Jin
    Chen Shanqi
    Hu Liqin
    Li Yazhou
    Li Chun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (04) : 1779 - 1786
  • [25] APPLICATION OF A LIMIT EXCEEDANCE IMPORTANCE MEASURE TO RISK-INFORMED DESIGN
    Johnson, B. C.
    Apostolakis, G. E.
    Denning, R.
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 172 (02) : 108 - 119
  • [26] ON THE USE OF BINARY IMPORTANCE DECISION FOR RISK-INFORMED CATEGORIZATION OF SSCs
    Zeng, Wei
    Yu, Hongxing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 2, 2009, : 323 - 329
  • [27] Risk-informed simulation for sustainable product design decision making
    Enyoghasi, Christian
    Badurdeen, Fazleena
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - HAND IN HAND TO SUSTAINABILITY ON GLOBE, 2020, 43 : 399 - 406
  • [28] Risk-informed design of IRIS using a level-1 probabilistic risk assessment from its conceptual design phase
    Mizuno, Y
    Ninokata, H
    Finnicum, DJ
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2005, 87 (02) : 201 - 209
  • [29] Techniques for modelling PSAs for use in risk-informed PSA applications and risk monitors
    Commandeur, AJ
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 403 - 409
  • [30] Risk-Informed Condition Assessment of a Bridge with Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
    Hariri-Ardebili, Mohammad Amin
    Saouma, Victor E.
    Merz, Christine
    [J]. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2018, 115 (02) : 475 - 487