Measurement uncertainty analysis of low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy: post-implant dosimetry

被引:6
|
作者
Gregory, Kent J. [1 ]
Pattison, John E. [1 ]
Bibbo, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn Appl Phys, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Div Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
关键词
LDR brachytherapy; Prostate; D-90; Uncertainty; GUM; CT HEAD SCANS; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN-BRACHYTHERAPY; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY; TISSUE COMPOSITION; PERMANENT IMPLANT; STRANDED SEEDS;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-014-0325-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The minimal dose covering 90 % of the prostate volume-D (90)-is arguably the most important dosimetric parameter in low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy. In this study an analysis of the measurement uncertainties in D (90) from low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy was conducted for two common treatment procedures with two different post-implant dosimetry methods. The analysis was undertaken in order to determine the magnitude of D (90) uncertainty, how the magnitude of the uncertainty varied when D (90) was calculated using different dosimetry methods, and which factors were the major contributors to the uncertainty. The analysis considered the prostate as being homogeneous and tissue equivalent and made use of published data, as well as original data collected specifically for this analysis, and was performed according to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). It was found that when prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted in two separate sessions using only CT images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 25 % at the 95 % confidence interval. When prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted during a single session using CT and ultrasound images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 33 %. Methods for reducing these uncertainty levels are discussed. It was found that variations in contouring the target tissue made the largest contribution to D (90) uncertainty, while the uncertainty in seed source strength made only a small contribution. It is important that clinicians appreciate the overall magnitude of D (90) uncertainty and understand the factors that affect it so that clinical decisions are soundly based, and resources are appropriately allocated.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A novel perineal shield for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Weiner, Joseph P.
    Schwartz, David
    Safdieh, Joseph
    Polubarov, Alex
    Telly, Tejas
    Worth, Matthew
    Schreiber, David
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 7 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [42] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-grade prostate cancer
    Raabe, Nils Kristian
    Normann, Marius
    Lilleby, Wolfgang
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (06) : 548 - 552
  • [43] Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer in Low Resource Settings
    Echevarria, M.
    Naghavi, A. O.
    Abuodeh, Y. A.
    Chevere, C. M.
    Yamoah, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E408 - E408
  • [44] Effect of the timing of hydrogel spacer placement on prostate and rectal dosimetry of low-dose-rate brachytherapy implants
    Butler, Wayne M.
    Kurko, Brian S.
    Scholl, Whitney J.
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [45] Is there a role for post-implant dosimetry following real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
    Potters, L
    Calugaru, E
    Jassal, A
    Mullen, EE
    Presser, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S35 - S36
  • [46] Dosimetric guidance on using brachytherapy (low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate) to offset a flawed permanent prostate implant
    Zaider, Marco
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, 8 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [47] RE-IMPLANT: A THERAPEUTICAL OPTION IN CASE OF INADEQUATE POST-IMPLANT DOSIMETRY AFTER PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    Losa, A.
    Nava, L.
    Mangili, P.
    Longobardi, B.
    Di Muzio, N.
    Lughezzani, G.
    Montorsi, F.
    Guazzoni, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 310 - 310
  • [48] A retrospective analysis after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent 125I seed implant: clinical and dosimetric results in 70 patients
    Chiumento, Costanza
    Montagna, Antonietta
    Clemente, Stefania
    Cozzolino, Mariella
    Fusco, Vincenzo
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2011, 97 (03): : 335 - 340
  • [49] A Robust MRI-Only Workflow for Post-Implant Localization and Dosimetry of Prostate Brachytherapy Seeds
    Nosrati, R.
    Wronski, M.
    Ravi, A.
    Song, W.
    Pejovic-Milic, A.
    Morton, G.
    Stanisz, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E702 - E702
  • [50] Calcifications in low-dose rate prostate seed brachytherapy treatment: Post-planning dosimetry and predictive factors
    Fekete, Charles-Antoine Collins
    Plamondon, Mathieu
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Vigneault, Eric
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Beaulieu, Luc
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 114 (03) : 339 - 344