Measurement uncertainty analysis of low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy: post-implant dosimetry

被引:6
|
作者
Gregory, Kent J. [1 ]
Pattison, John E. [1 ]
Bibbo, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn Appl Phys, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Div Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
关键词
LDR brachytherapy; Prostate; D-90; Uncertainty; GUM; CT HEAD SCANS; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN-BRACHYTHERAPY; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY; TISSUE COMPOSITION; PERMANENT IMPLANT; STRANDED SEEDS;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-014-0325-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The minimal dose covering 90 % of the prostate volume-D (90)-is arguably the most important dosimetric parameter in low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy. In this study an analysis of the measurement uncertainties in D (90) from low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy was conducted for two common treatment procedures with two different post-implant dosimetry methods. The analysis was undertaken in order to determine the magnitude of D (90) uncertainty, how the magnitude of the uncertainty varied when D (90) was calculated using different dosimetry methods, and which factors were the major contributors to the uncertainty. The analysis considered the prostate as being homogeneous and tissue equivalent and made use of published data, as well as original data collected specifically for this analysis, and was performed according to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). It was found that when prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted in two separate sessions using only CT images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 25 % at the 95 % confidence interval. When prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted during a single session using CT and ultrasound images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 33 %. Methods for reducing these uncertainty levels are discussed. It was found that variations in contouring the target tissue made the largest contribution to D (90) uncertainty, while the uncertainty in seed source strength made only a small contribution. It is important that clinicians appreciate the overall magnitude of D (90) uncertainty and understand the factors that affect it so that clinical decisions are soundly based, and resources are appropriately allocated.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TrueFISP for Single Sequence MR-Only Post-Implant Dosimetry of Prostate Brachytherapy
    Sanders, J.
    Frank, S.
    Venkatesan, A.
    Bathala, T.
    Szklaruk, J.
    Blanchard, P.
    Kudchadker, R.
    Ma, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3049 - 3049
  • [32] Prostate post-implant dosimetry: Interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion
    De Brabandere, Marisol
    Hoskin, Peter
    Haustermans, Karin
    Van den Heuvel, Frank
    Siebert, Frank-Andre
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (02) : 192 - 198
  • [33] PROSTATE POST-IMPLANT DOSIMETRY: INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY IN SEED LOCALISATION, CONTOURING & FUSION
    De Brabandere, M.
    Haustermans, K.
    Van den Heuvel, F.
    Hoskin, P.
    Siebert, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S86 - S87
  • [34] Seed-displacements in the immediate post-implant phase in permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Karius, Andre
    Schweizer, Claudia
    Strnad, Vratislav
    Lotter, Michael
    Kreppner, Stephan
    Lamrani, Allison
    Fietkau, Rainer
    Bert, Christoph
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 183
  • [35] COMPARISON OF TWO PERMANENT PROSTATE SEED IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY TECHNIQUES - INCLUDING POST-IMPLANT EVALUATION
    Andersen, K.
    Geertsen, P. F.
    Kristensen, B. Holch
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S159 - S160
  • [36] Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: A comparison between higher and lower source density
    Thomas, Carys W.
    Kruk, Alexandra
    McGahan, Colleen E.
    Spadinger, Ingrid
    Morris, William James
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 83 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [37] Deformable registration of X-ray to MRI for post-implant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy
    Park, Seyoun
    Song, Danny Y.
    Lee, Junghoon
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2016, 9786
  • [38] Radiation protection and dosimetry issues for patients with prostate cancer after I-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy permanent implant
    Licciardello, Tiziana
    Feliciani, Giacomo
    Mazzotti, Giorgio
    Mostacci, Domiziano
    Sarnelli, Anna
    Menghi, Enrico
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (01) : 272 - 278
  • [39] Relapse patterns after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Lamb, David S.
    Greig, Lynne
    FitzJohn, Trevor
    Russell, Grant L.
    Nacey, John N.
    Iupati, Douglas
    Woods, Lisa
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [40] A COMPARISON OF POST-IMPLANT US/CT IMAGE FUSION AND MRI/CT FUSION FOR I-125 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY POST-IMPLANT DOSIMETRY
    Patanjali, N.
    Keyes, M.
    Morris, J.
    Liu, M.
    Harrison, R.
    Spadinger, I.
    Moravan, V.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S40 - S40