Measurement uncertainty analysis of low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy: post-implant dosimetry

被引:6
|
作者
Gregory, Kent J. [1 ]
Pattison, John E. [1 ]
Bibbo, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn Appl Phys, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Div Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
关键词
LDR brachytherapy; Prostate; D-90; Uncertainty; GUM; CT HEAD SCANS; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN-BRACHYTHERAPY; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY; TISSUE COMPOSITION; PERMANENT IMPLANT; STRANDED SEEDS;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-014-0325-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The minimal dose covering 90 % of the prostate volume-D (90)-is arguably the most important dosimetric parameter in low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy. In this study an analysis of the measurement uncertainties in D (90) from low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy was conducted for two common treatment procedures with two different post-implant dosimetry methods. The analysis was undertaken in order to determine the magnitude of D (90) uncertainty, how the magnitude of the uncertainty varied when D (90) was calculated using different dosimetry methods, and which factors were the major contributors to the uncertainty. The analysis considered the prostate as being homogeneous and tissue equivalent and made use of published data, as well as original data collected specifically for this analysis, and was performed according to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). It was found that when prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted in two separate sessions using only CT images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 25 % at the 95 % confidence interval. When prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted during a single session using CT and ultrasound images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 33 %. Methods for reducing these uncertainty levels are discussed. It was found that variations in contouring the target tissue made the largest contribution to D (90) uncertainty, while the uncertainty in seed source strength made only a small contribution. It is important that clinicians appreciate the overall magnitude of D (90) uncertainty and understand the factors that affect it so that clinical decisions are soundly based, and resources are appropriately allocated.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy: A Tomosynthesis-Based Intra-Operative Post-Implant Dose Evaluation
    Brunet-Benkhoucha, M.
    Verhaegen, F.
    Lassalle, S.
    Beliveau-Nadeau, D.
    Reniers, B.
    Donath, D.
    Taussky, D.
    Carrier, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [22] The uncertainty in determining the post-implant CT-scan dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Wang, X
    Calugaru, E
    Potters, L
    Grob, BM
    Bluth, MJ
    Torre, TG
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 281 - 281
  • [23] Correlations of post-implant regional dosimetric parameters at 24 hours and one month, with clinical results of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Okazaki, Eiichiro
    Kuratsukuri, Katsuyuki
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Tanaka, Tomoaki
    Ogino, Ryo
    Nishikawa, Tomohiro
    Morimoto, Hideyuki
    Hosono, Masako
    Miki, Yukio
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 9 (06) : 499 - 507
  • [24] Accounting for Prostate Motion in Interstitial Prostate LDR Brachytherapy for Aiding Post-Implant Dosimetry
    Gulam, M.
    Gopal, A.
    Pradhan, D.
    Smith, C.
    Nurushev, T.
    Chetty, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [25] Investigation to Replace CT by MRI in Post-Implant Dosimetry of Prostate Permanent Brachytherapy
    Chen, Q.
    Blair, H.
    Ciezki, J.
    Mahadevan, A.
    Began, N.
    Suh, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [26] Post-Implant Dosimetry in Prostate Brachytherapy by X-Ray and MRI Fusion
    Park, S.
    Le, Y.
    Song, D.
    Lee, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3794 - 3794
  • [27] Evaluation of Post-Implant Dosimetry in LDR Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Khouj, Y.
    Harris, T.
    O'Farrell, D.
    Sugar, E. Neubauer
    Nguyen, P.
    Orio, P.
    King, M.
    Buzurovic, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [28] A conformal method of ultrasound-guided low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy reduces post-implant morbidity
    Addesa, A. E.
    Ramakrishnan, V.
    Anscher, M. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S335 - S335
  • [29] Assessment of the feasibility of using transrectal ultrasound for postimplant dosimetry in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Davies, Rhian Sian
    Perrett, Teresa
    Powell, Jane
    Barber, Jim
    Tanguay, Jacob
    Button, Michael
    Cochlin, Dennis
    Smith, Christian
    Lester, Jason Francis
    Medical Dosimetry, 2016, 41 (04) : 290 - 295
  • [30] Regional Quadrant Dosimetry and Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy
    Hamilton, S.
    Keyes, M.
    Moravan, V.
    Spadinger, I.
    Morris, W. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E189 - E190