Measurement uncertainty analysis of low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy: post-implant dosimetry

被引:6
|
作者
Gregory, Kent J. [1 ]
Pattison, John E. [1 ]
Bibbo, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn Appl Phys, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Div Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
关键词
LDR brachytherapy; Prostate; D-90; Uncertainty; GUM; CT HEAD SCANS; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN-BRACHYTHERAPY; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY; TISSUE COMPOSITION; PERMANENT IMPLANT; STRANDED SEEDS;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-014-0325-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The minimal dose covering 90 % of the prostate volume-D (90)-is arguably the most important dosimetric parameter in low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy. In this study an analysis of the measurement uncertainties in D (90) from low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy was conducted for two common treatment procedures with two different post-implant dosimetry methods. The analysis was undertaken in order to determine the magnitude of D (90) uncertainty, how the magnitude of the uncertainty varied when D (90) was calculated using different dosimetry methods, and which factors were the major contributors to the uncertainty. The analysis considered the prostate as being homogeneous and tissue equivalent and made use of published data, as well as original data collected specifically for this analysis, and was performed according to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). It was found that when prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted in two separate sessions using only CT images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 25 % at the 95 % confidence interval. When prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted during a single session using CT and ultrasound images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 33 %. Methods for reducing these uncertainty levels are discussed. It was found that variations in contouring the target tissue made the largest contribution to D (90) uncertainty, while the uncertainty in seed source strength made only a small contribution. It is important that clinicians appreciate the overall magnitude of D (90) uncertainty and understand the factors that affect it so that clinical decisions are soundly based, and resources are appropriately allocated.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement uncertainty analysis of low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy: post-implant dosimetry
    Kent J. Gregory
    John E. Pattison
    Giovanni Bibbo
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2015, 38 : 71 - 81
  • [2] Effect of Contouring Uncertainty in Post Implant Dosimetry of Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Permanent Seed Brachytherapy
    Mashouf, S.
    Safigholi, H.
    Merino, T.
    Soliman, A.
    Ravi, A.
    Morton, G.
    Song, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3443 - 3444
  • [3] A Comparison of Post-implant Day 0 vs. Day 30 Dosimetry for Low-dose-rate Interstitial Prostate Brachytherapy
    Shasha, D.
    Patone, H.
    Patel, S.
    Orlanzino, M.
    Shah, N.
    Harrison, L. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S317 - S317
  • [4] Effects of seed migration on post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy
    Gao, M.
    Wang, J. Z.
    Nag, S.
    Gupta, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) : 471 - 480
  • [5] Impact of Seed Localization On Post-Implant Dosimetry in Prostate Brachytherapy
    Chew, M.
    Xue, J.
    Houser, C.
    Misic, V.
    Cao, J.
    Cornwell, T.
    Yu, Y.
    Gressen, E.
    Handler, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [6] Quantifying the effect of seed orientation in postplanning dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Fekete, Charles-Antoine Collins
    Plamondon, Mathieu
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Vigneault, Eric
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Beaulieu, Luc
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (10)
  • [7] Dosimetry Modeling for Focal Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar
    Mason, Josh
    Bownes, Peter
    Henry, Ann
    Dickinson, Louise
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Emberton, Mark
    Langley, Stephen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (04): : 787 - 793
  • [8] Importance of post-implant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Stock, RG
    Stone, NN
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (04) : 434 - 439
  • [9] A post-implant dosimetry simulator for permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy
    Zhang, Claire
    Batchelar, Deidre
    Andrews, Jeff
    Crook, Juanita
    Hilts, Michelle
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (08) : 5700 - 5701
  • [10] Case series analysis of post-brachytherapy prostate edema and its relevance to post-implant dosimetry. Post-implant prostate edema and dosimetry
    Tejwani, Ajay
    Bieniek, Eva
    Puckett, Lindsay
    Lavaf, Amir
    Guirguis, Adel
    Bennish, Aaron
    Ashamalla, Hani
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 4 (02) : 75 - 80