Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process

被引:33
|
作者
Sun, Hongyue [1 ]
Rao, Prahalad K. [2 ]
Kong, Zhenyu [3 ]
Deng, Xinwei [4 ]
Jin, Ran [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Grado Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Dept Stat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Additive manufacturing (AM); functional quantitative and qualitative (QQ) models; fused deposition modeling (FDM); in situ process variables; QQ responses; OF-THE-ART; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; REGRESSION-MODELS; FDM MACHINE; OPTIMIZATION; DISCRETE; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2017.2763609
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables flexible part geometry and functionality, and reduces product development life cycle by direct layer-wise fabrication from CAD files. In the last decade, great achievements are made on AM materials, machines, processes, etc. However, the quality of the AM parts is still questionable for industrial specifications. On the one hand, AM part quality variables can be either quantitative, such as dimensional accuracy, or qualitative, such as binary indicators for voids, missing features, or surface roughness. On the other hand, both offline process setting variables and functional in situ process variables can be measured and modeled with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) quality response variables. In this paper, the QQ quality response variables are modeled by offline process setting variables and in situ process variables via functional QQ models. The modeling of these in situ process variables provides the basis for real-time monitoring and control for AM processes. Simulation studies and experimental data from a fused deposition modeling process are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners-Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have attracted much attention and showed many advantages over the traditional subtractive manufacturing processes. However, the product quality issues make AM intractable for high-quality parts in industrial applications. This paper aims to address the quality issues by modeling both quantitative quality variables, such as dimensional accuracy, and qualitative quality variables, such as the binary (go/no-go) indicator for surface conditions. Both offline process setting variables and in situ process variables are used in the model as predictors. Such a model is important for systematically quality evaluation of AM parts, and provides the basis for future process monitoring and control. The merits of the proposed method are demonstrated with simulation studies and a case study in a fused deposition modeling process.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Models
    Komarnicki, Piotr
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING, 2017, : 241 - 247
  • [2] PROBABILISTIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING PROCESS USING SURROGATE MODELS
    Liu, Yi
    Wang, Pingfeng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2B, 2016, : 597 - 605
  • [3] Effect of process parameters on parts quality and process efficiency of fused deposition modeling
    Galetto, Maurizio
    Verna, Elisa
    Genta, Gianfranco
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 156
  • [4] Anisotropic Finite Element Modeling of the Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Ogden, Skyler
    Kessler, Scott
    [J]. CHARACTERIZATION OF MINERALS, METALS, AND MATERIALS 2014, 2014, : 235 - 243
  • [5] Biodegradable, functional polyesters for fused deposition modeling
    Dube, Koustubh
    Guvendiren, Murat
    Damodaran, Vinod
    Kohn, Joachim
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [6] Temperature Analysis in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Zhou, Yong
    Xiong, Gang
    Nyberg, Timo
    Liu, Dan
    [J]. 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND CONTROL ENGINEERING (ICISCE), 2016, : 678 - 682
  • [7] Performance assessment of fused deposition modeling process
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman
    Mian, Syed Hammad
    Ameen, Wadea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [8] Topology optimization for fused deposition modeling process
    Rezaie, R.
    Badrossamay, M.
    Ghaie, A.
    Moosavi, H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ELECTRO PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL MACHINING (ISEM), 2013, 6 : 521 - 526
  • [9] Simulation of edge quality in fused deposition modeling
    Armillotta, Antonio
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) : 541 - 554
  • [10] Modeling redundancy: Quantitative and qualitative models
    Mili, A.
    Wu, Lan
    Sheldon, F. T.
    Shereshevsky, M.
    Desharnais, J.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 1 - +