Preventive Effect Heterogeneity: Causal Inference in Personalized Prevention

被引:15
|
作者
Howe, George W. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, 2125 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
Research design; Causal inference; Personalized prevention; Moderation; PROPENSITY SCORE; INTERNALIZING SYMPTOMS; HISPANIC ADOLESCENTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; INTERVENTION; RACE; ASSOCIATIONS; SENSITIVITY; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11121-017-0826-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper employs a causal inference framework to explore two logically distinct forms of preventive effect heterogeneity relevant for studying variation in preventive effect as a basis for developing more personalized interventions. Following VanderWeele (2015), I begin with a discussion of causal interaction involving manipulable moderators that combine to yield more complex nonadditive effects. This is contrasted with effect heterogeneity, which involves variation in causal structure indexed by stable characteristics of populations or contexts. The paper then discusses one particularly promising approach, the baseline target moderated mediation (BTMM) design, which uses theoretically informed baseline target moderators to strengthen causal inference, suggesting methods for using BTMM designs to develop targeting strategies for personalized prevention. It presents examples of recent intervention trials that apply these different forms of moderation, and discusses causal inference and the problem of moderation confounding, reviewing methods for minimizing its impact, including recent advances in the use of propensity score matching.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hercules: Heterogeneity-Aware Inference Serving for At-Scale Personalized Recommendation
    Ke, Liu
    Gupta, Udit
    Hempsteadis, Mark
    Wu, Carole-Jean
    Lee, Hsien-Hsin S.
    Zhang, Xuan
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE (HPCA 2022), 2022, : 141 - 154
  • [22] Causal Inference
    Kuang, Kun
    Li, Lian
    Geng, Zhi
    Xu, Lei
    Zhang, Kun
    Liao, Beishui
    Huang, Huaxin
    Ding, Peng
    Miao, Wang
    Jiang, Zhichao
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [23] CAUSAL INFERENCE
    ROTHMAN, KJ
    LANES, S
    ROBINS, J
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (06) : 555 - 556
  • [24] Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them
    Rohrer, Julia M.
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2024, 18 (03)
  • [25] Statistical Inference on the Estimators of the Adherer Average Causal Effect
    Zhang, Ying
    Fu, Haoda
    Ruberg, Stephen J.
    Qu, Yongming
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (03): : 392 - 395
  • [26] Causal Effect Prediction with Flow-based Inference
    Ren, Shaogang
    Li, Dingcheng
    Li, Ping
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2022, : 1167 - 1172
  • [27] SEMIPARAMETRIC INFERENCE OF CAUSAL EFFECT WITH NONIGNORABLE MISSING CONFOUNDERS
    Sun, Zhaohan
    Liu, Lan
    [J]. STATISTICA SINICA, 2021, 31 (04) : 1669 - 1688
  • [28] Goal of causal inference interacts with base rate of effect
    Cheng, PW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 5424 - 5424
  • [29] Causal inference and effect estimation using observational data
    Igelstrom, Erik
    Craig, Peter
    Lewsey, Jim
    Lynch, John
    Pearce, Anna
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 76 (11) : 960 - 966
  • [30] Counterfactuals, causal effect heterogeneity, and the catholic school effect on learning
    Morgan, SL
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2001, 74 (04) : 341 - 374