Predictors of sac regression after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair

被引:10
|
作者
Li, Ming [1 ]
Stern, Jordan R. [1 ]
Tran, Kenneth [1 ]
Deslarzes-Dubuis, Celine [1 ]
Lee, Jason T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Aneurysm; Aortic; Endovascular procedures; Risk factors; Stents; Vascular prosthesis; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; II ENDOLEAKS; TYPE-2; ENDOLEAK; NATURAL-HISTORY; SHRINKAGE; OPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.067
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Aneurysm sac regression after standard endovascular aortic repair is associated with improved outcomes, but similar data are limited after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). We sought to evaluate sac regression after FEVAR, and identify any predictors of this favorable outcome. Methods: Patients undergoing elective FEVAR using the commercially available Zenith Fenestrated device (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) from 2012 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The maximal aortic diameter was compared between the preoperative scan and those obtained in follow-up. Patients with of 5 mm or more sac regression were included in the regression (REG) group, with all others in the nonregression (NONREG) group. Outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors for sac regression. Results: We included 132 patients undergoing FEVAR in the analysis. At amean follow-up of 33.1 months, 65 patients (49.2%) had sac regression of 5 mm or more and comprised the REG group (n = 65 [49.2%]). The REG group had smaller diameter devices, and were less likely to have had concomitant chimney grafts placed (P<.05). The NONREG group had a higher incidence of type II endoleak (35.8% vs 12.3%; P = .002). Sac regression was associated with a significant mortality benefit on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified adjunctive parallel grafting (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.36; P < .01), persistent type II endoleak (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P < .01), and a greater number of target vessels (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62; P = .002) as independent predictors of failure to regress. Conclusions: Sac regression after FEVAR occurred in nearly one-half of patients, but seems to be less common in patients with persistent type II endoleaks and those undergoing concomitant parallel grafting. Sac regression was associated with a significant survival advantage, and can be used as a clinical marker for success after FEVAR.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fenestrated endovascular repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm
    Scurr, J. R. H.
    Brennan, J. A.
    Gilling-Smith, G. L.
    Harris, P. L.
    Vallabhaneni, S. R.
    McWilliams, R. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) : 326 - 332
  • [42] Influencing factors of sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Lalys, Florent
    Daoudal, Anne
    Gindre, Juliette
    Goksu, Cemil
    Lucas, Antoine
    Kaladji, Adrien
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 1830 - 1838
  • [43] Snorkel endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair: is it a competition?
    Tanious, Adam
    Lee, Jason T.
    Shames, Murray
    SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 29 (1-2) : 68 - 73
  • [44] Aortoduodenal fistula after endovascular aneurysm repair presenting with aneurysm sac abscess
    Lane, John S.
    Barleben, Andrew R.
    Kubaska, Stephen M.
    Fujitani, Roy M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (04) : 919 - 920
  • [45] Fenestrated-Branch Endovascular Repair After Prior Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Juszczak, Maciej
    Vezzosi, Massimo
    Nasr, Hosaam
    Claridge, Martin
    Adam, Donald J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (05) : 728 - 737
  • [46] Outcomes of Explants vs Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair After Failed Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Dias, Agenor
    Steenberge, Sean
    Farivar, Behzad S.
    Brier, Corey S.
    Kuramochi, Yuki
    Lyden, Sean P.
    Eagleton, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 44S - 45S
  • [47] Letter by Fillinger Regarding Article, "Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Enlargement After Endovascular Repair"
    Fillinger, Mark
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (05) : E341 - E341
  • [48] Response to Letters Regarding Article, "Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Enlargement After Endovascular Repair"
    Schanzer, Andres
    Greenberg, Roy
    Hevelone, Nathanael
    Robinson, William
    Eslami, Mohammad
    Goldberg, Robert
    Messina, Louis
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (05) : E342 - E343
  • [49] Reinterventions and sac dynamics after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair with physician-modified endografts for index aneurysm repair and following proximal failure of prior endovascular aortic repair
    Sanders, Andrew P.
    Swerdlow, Nicholas J.
    Yadavalli, Sai Divya
    Marcaccio, Christina L.
    Stangenberg, Lars
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 79 (06)
  • [50] Abdominal aortic aneurysm neck dilatation and sac remodeling in fenestrated compared to standard endovascular aortic repair
    Li, Chong
    Teter, Katherine
    Rockman, Caron
    Garg, Karan
    Cayne, Neal
    Sadek, Mikel
    Jacobowitz, Glenn
    Silvestro, Michele
    Ramkhelawon, Bhama
    Maldonado, Thomas S.
    VASCULAR, 2023, 31 (01) : 3 - 9