Predictors of sac regression after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair

被引:10
|
作者
Li, Ming [1 ]
Stern, Jordan R. [1 ]
Tran, Kenneth [1 ]
Deslarzes-Dubuis, Celine [1 ]
Lee, Jason T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Aneurysm; Aortic; Endovascular procedures; Risk factors; Stents; Vascular prosthesis; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; II ENDOLEAKS; TYPE-2; ENDOLEAK; NATURAL-HISTORY; SHRINKAGE; OPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.067
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Aneurysm sac regression after standard endovascular aortic repair is associated with improved outcomes, but similar data are limited after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). We sought to evaluate sac regression after FEVAR, and identify any predictors of this favorable outcome. Methods: Patients undergoing elective FEVAR using the commercially available Zenith Fenestrated device (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) from 2012 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The maximal aortic diameter was compared between the preoperative scan and those obtained in follow-up. Patients with of 5 mm or more sac regression were included in the regression (REG) group, with all others in the nonregression (NONREG) group. Outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors for sac regression. Results: We included 132 patients undergoing FEVAR in the analysis. At amean follow-up of 33.1 months, 65 patients (49.2%) had sac regression of 5 mm or more and comprised the REG group (n = 65 [49.2%]). The REG group had smaller diameter devices, and were less likely to have had concomitant chimney grafts placed (P<.05). The NONREG group had a higher incidence of type II endoleak (35.8% vs 12.3%; P = .002). Sac regression was associated with a significant mortality benefit on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified adjunctive parallel grafting (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.36; P < .01), persistent type II endoleak (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P < .01), and a greater number of target vessels (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62; P = .002) as independent predictors of failure to regress. Conclusions: Sac regression after FEVAR occurred in nearly one-half of patients, but seems to be less common in patients with persistent type II endoleaks and those undergoing concomitant parallel grafting. Sac regression was associated with a significant survival advantage, and can be used as a clinical marker for success after FEVAR.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair promotes positive infrarenal neck remodeling and greater sac shrinkage compared with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Teter, Katherine
    Li, Chong
    Ferreira, Luis M.
    Ferrer, Miguel
    Rockman, Caron
    Jacobowitz, Glenn
    Cayne, Neal
    Garg, Karan
    Maldonado, Thomas S.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 76 (02) : 344 - +
  • [32] Variability in aneurysm sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair based on a comprehensive registry of patients in Eastern Ontario
    Jetty, Prasad
    Husereau, Don
    Kansal, Vinay
    Zhang, Tinghua
    Nagpal, Sudhir
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (05) : 1469 - 1478
  • [33] Role of Type II Endoleak in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Regression After Endovascular Repair
    Kray, Jared
    Kirk, Spencer
    Chew, David
    Franko, Jan
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (04) : 1102 - 1102
  • [34] Statins Promote Residual Aneurysm Sac Regression Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Gray, Cleona
    Goodman, Patrick
    O'Malley, M. Kevin
    O'Donohoe, Martin K.
    McDonnell, Ciaran O.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 48 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [35] The Impact of Reinterventions on Survival After Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Gallitto, Enrico
    Faggioli, Gianluca
    Fenelli, Cecilia
    Mascoli, Chiara
    Pini, Rodolfo
    Vacirca, Andrea
    Logiacco, Antonino
    Gargiulo, Mauro
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : E48 - E48
  • [36] Evaluation of Hemodynamic Properties After Chimney and Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Malatos, Stavros
    Fazzini, Laura
    Raptis, Anastasios
    Nana, Petroula
    Kouvelos, George
    Tasso, Paola
    Gallo, Diego
    Morbiducci, Umberto
    Xenos, Michail A.
    Giannoukas, Athanasios
    Matsagkas, Miltiadis
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 104 : 237 - 247
  • [37] Gluteal Compartment Syndrome after Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Hau, Melinda Y. T.
    Glasby, Michael
    Davies, Robert S. M.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 30 : 309.e17 - 309.e19
  • [38] Fenestrated Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Pena, Constantino S.
    Schiro, Brian J.
    Benenati, James F.
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 21 (03) : 156 - 164
  • [39] Remodeling of the Proximal Sealing Zone and Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Aortic Repair or Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Suzuki, Takahiro
    Mitsuoka, Hiroshi
    Terai, Yasuhiko
    Miyano, Yuta
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 109 : 47 - 54
  • [40] Lower Extremity Neurologic Impairment After Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Rocha, Bernandino
    Braun, Jonathan
    Mills, Joseph L.
    Younes, Houssam
    Barshes, Neal R.
    Kougias, Panos
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (01) : E6 - E7