Predictors of sac regression after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair

被引:10
|
作者
Li, Ming [1 ]
Stern, Jordan R. [1 ]
Tran, Kenneth [1 ]
Deslarzes-Dubuis, Celine [1 ]
Lee, Jason T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Aneurysm; Aortic; Endovascular procedures; Risk factors; Stents; Vascular prosthesis; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; II ENDOLEAKS; TYPE-2; ENDOLEAK; NATURAL-HISTORY; SHRINKAGE; OPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.067
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Aneurysm sac regression after standard endovascular aortic repair is associated with improved outcomes, but similar data are limited after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). We sought to evaluate sac regression after FEVAR, and identify any predictors of this favorable outcome. Methods: Patients undergoing elective FEVAR using the commercially available Zenith Fenestrated device (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) from 2012 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The maximal aortic diameter was compared between the preoperative scan and those obtained in follow-up. Patients with of 5 mm or more sac regression were included in the regression (REG) group, with all others in the nonregression (NONREG) group. Outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors for sac regression. Results: We included 132 patients undergoing FEVAR in the analysis. At amean follow-up of 33.1 months, 65 patients (49.2%) had sac regression of 5 mm or more and comprised the REG group (n = 65 [49.2%]). The REG group had smaller diameter devices, and were less likely to have had concomitant chimney grafts placed (P<.05). The NONREG group had a higher incidence of type II endoleak (35.8% vs 12.3%; P = .002). Sac regression was associated with a significant mortality benefit on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified adjunctive parallel grafting (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.36; P < .01), persistent type II endoleak (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P < .01), and a greater number of target vessels (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62; P = .002) as independent predictors of failure to regress. Conclusions: Sac regression after FEVAR occurred in nearly one-half of patients, but seems to be less common in patients with persistent type II endoleaks and those undergoing concomitant parallel grafting. Sac regression was associated with a significant survival advantage, and can be used as a clinical marker for success after FEVAR.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Midterm Outcomes and Aneurysm Sac Dynamics Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair after Previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Sulzer, Titia A. L.
    de Bruin, Jorg L.
    Rastogi, Vinamr
    Boer, Gert Jan
    Mesnard, Thomas
    Fioole, Bram
    van Rijn, Marie Josee
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    Verhagen, Hence J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (06) : 886 - 893
  • [2] Increased Aortic Sac Regression and Decreased Infrarenal Aortic Neck Dilation After Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Compared With Standard Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Li, Chong
    Teter, Katherine
    Rockman, Caron
    Garg, Karan
    Cayne, Neal
    Veith, Frank
    Sadek, Mikel
    Maldonado, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (05) : E358 - E359
  • [3] Effect of Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair or Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Changes in Aneurysm Sac Size
    Hossain, Prio
    Conway, Allan M.
    Nhan Nguyen Tran
    Qato, Khalil
    Lee, Samuel
    Giangola, Gary
    Schreiber-Gregory, Deanna
    Carroccio, Alfio
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : E130 - E130
  • [4] Aneurysm Sac Regression and Survival After Fenestrated-branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR)
    Motta, Fernando
    Parodi, F. Ezequiel
    Knowles, Martyn
    Pascarella, Luigi
    Marston, William
    McGinigle, Katharine
    Ohana, Elad
    Farber, Mark
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : E30 - E31
  • [5] Aneurysm Sac Dynamics and Mid-term Outcomes Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair After Previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Sulzer, Titia
    de Bruin, Jorg L.
    Rastogi, Vinamr
    Boer, Gert Jan
    Ultee, Klaas H. J.
    Fioole, Bram
    Oderich, Gustavo
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Verhagen, Hence J. M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (06) : E77 - E77
  • [6] Postdissection aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Figueroa, Andres V.
    Tanenbaum, Mira T.
    Timaran, Carlos H.
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    Eagleton, Matthew J.
    Schanzer, Andres
    Farber, Mark A.
    Beck, Adam W.
    Schneider, Darren B.
    Gasper, Warren
    Sweet, Matthew P.
    Lee, Anthony
    Cantor, Ryan S.
    Li, Xingsheng
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 80 (03)
  • [7] New predictors of aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Jeong, Min-Jae
    Kwon, Hyunwook
    Ko, Gi-Young
    Gwon, Dong Il
    Kim, Min-Ju
    Han, Youngjin
    Kwon, Tae-Won
    Cho, Yong-Pil
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6591 - 6599
  • [8] New predictors of aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Min-Jae Jeong
    Hyunwook Kwon
    Gi-Young Ko
    Dong Il Gwon
    Min-Ju Kim
    Youngjin Han
    Tae-Won Kwon
    Yong-Pil Cho
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6591 - 6599
  • [9] Aortic Biomechanics and Early Sac Regression After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Bogdanovic, Marko
    Siika, Antti
    Liljeqvist, Moritz Lindquist
    Gasser, Christian
    Hultgren, Rebecka
    Roy, Joy
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : E334 - E335
  • [10] Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Enlargement After Endovascular Repair
    Schanzer, Andres
    Greenberg, Roy K.
    Hevelone, Nathanael
    Robinson, William P.
    Eslami, Mohammad H.
    Goldberg, Robert J.
    Messina, Louis
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (24) : 2848 - 2855