Braess Paradox of traffic networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors

被引:12
|
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Wang, David Z. W. [1 ]
Sun, Huijun [2 ]
Feng, Zengzhe [2 ]
Wu, Jianjun [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Urban Transportat Complex Syst Theory & T, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, State Key Lab Rail Traff Control & Safety, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Braess Paradox; Mixed equilibrium; Braess network; Grid network; STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM; ASSIGNMENT MODEL; SYSTEM OPTIMUM; DESIGN PROBLEM; LINK TOLLS; FORMULATION; TIME; MULTICLASS; RELIABILITY; EXISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2016.05.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Under the user equilibrium (UE) behavior assumption, the Braess Paradox (BP) and its variations have been well investigated. However, users do not always follow the UE behavior. In reality, there are likely quiet a few non-collaborative Cournot-Nash (CN) players coexisting with UE players in the common traffic network. Users in a CN player are completely collaborative to minimize their total travel cost and users subordinating to different players are perfectly competitive. Considering both UE and CN players in the congested network, it remains unclear that under what conditions the BP will occur. In this paper, the BP occurrence conditions under the UE-CN mixed equilibrium are firstly investigated using the classical Braess network with linear link cost function. Then, the BP conditions are studied to the ordinary grid network with nonlinear link cost function. It is shown that the BP occurrence in the conventional Braess network depends upon the link travel time function parameters and the demand level of users controlled by UE/CN players, and the BP occurs in the grid network only for certain demand combinations of users under one UE player and two CN players. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Braess Paradox in Layer-2 Blockchain Payment Networks
    Kotzer, Arad
    Rottenstreich, Ori
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCY, ICBC, 2023,
  • [42] Braess's paradox in oscillator networks, desynchronization and power outage
    Witthaut, Dirk
    Timme, Marc
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2012, 14
  • [43] Applicable Prevention Method of Braess Paradox in Urban Traffic Flow Guidance System
    Yang, Zhaosheng
    Gao, Peng
    Li, Mo
    Zhang, Nan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2011, 4 (06): : 1254 - 1261
  • [44] Braess paradox at the mesoscopic scale
    Sousa, A. A.
    Chaves, Andrey
    Farias, G. A.
    Peeters, F. M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2013, 88 (24):
  • [45] Collective intelligence and Braess' paradox
    Tumer, K
    Wolpert, D
    SEVENTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-2001) / TWELFTH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (IAAI-2000), 2000, : 104 - 109
  • [46] Braess's paradox in expanders
    Chung, Fan
    Young, Stephen J.
    Zhao, Wenbo
    RANDOM STRUCTURES & ALGORITHMS, 2012, 41 (04) : 451 - 468
  • [47] Matroids Are Immune to Braess' Paradox
    Fujishige, Satoru
    Goemans, Michel X.
    Harks, Tobias
    Peis, Britta
    Zenklusen, Rico
    MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (03) : 745 - 761
  • [48] On a mechanical analogue of the Braess paradox
    Chen, YY
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2005, 43 (06) : 1004 - 1016
  • [49] The negation of the Braess paradox as demand increases: The wisdom of crowds in transportation networks
    Nagurney, A.
    EPL, 2010, 91 (04)
  • [50] The Braess' paradox for pendent twins
    Ciardo, Lorenzo
    LINEAR ALGEBRA AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 590 (590) : 304 - 316