Five-Year Performance of an ESE Lightning Protection System for a Large Scale PV Power Plant in Thailand

被引:1
|
作者
Kongnok, Rungphet [1 ]
Pummaitong, Thanakorn [1 ]
Plangklang, Boonyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Rajamangala Univ Technol Thanyaburi, Dept Elect Engn, Fac Engn, 39 Moo 1,Klong 6, Khlong Luang 12110, Pathum Thani, Thailand
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2021年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
Franklin lightning protection; ESE lightning protection; PV power plant; STROKE;
D O I
10.3390/sym13112106
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This article presents a five-year performance review of an early streamer emission (ESE) air terminal lightning protection system for a large scale PV power plant in Thailand. The comparison effect of a Franklin lightning protection system and the ESE lightning protection system was analyzed for the PV power plant. The ESE lightning protection system was selected to be implemented in the PV power plant. The capacity of the PV power plant studied was 8 MWp on an area of 150,000 square meters in the Nong Ya Plong district, Phetchaburi province, Western Thailand. A Franklin lightning rod type was also designed to be implemented in this PV power plant. The Franklin lightning rod type comprised 122 pieces but the ESE lightning rod type consisted of only 11 pieces. The conceptual design of the Franklin rod type followed the standard of the Council of Engineers, Thailand, and the ESE lightning rod type followed the NFC17102 standard of France. The estimated cost of installation was a key comparison to select the lightning protection system; the total installation cost of the Franklin lightning rod type was USD 197,363.80 and the ESE lightning rod type was USD 44,338.06. The lightning system was applied to the lightning arrester in the power plant to provide good protection, in which the balance of the pole to the mounting position is required to optimize the system performance. The result of the simulation also showed that the shading effects of the Franklin rod type were greater than the ESE rod type. The installation cost of the Franklin lightning rod type was 4.45 times more expensive than the ESE lightning rod type. Therefore, the ESE lightning protection system was selected to be implemented in the PV power plant. From the recorded data of the five-year performance of the ESE lightning protection system (2016-2020), there were three occurrences of a lightning strike on the PV power plant. The ESE lightning protection system effectively protected and prevented the lightning strike to the PV power plant. This study can help and support with the selection of a lightning system for the protection of large scale PV power plants in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of a very large scale PV power system with energy storage for capacity firming
    Marinopoulos, Antonios
    Bakas, Panagiotis
    2015 IEEE EINDHOVEN POWERTECH, 2015,
  • [42] Integration of Large-Scale PV-BESS Generation into Power System for Power Shaping Control
    Jan-ngurn, Chanasith
    Romphochai, Sillawat
    Janjamraj, Natin
    Bhumkittipich, Krischonme
    2021 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES AND SYSTEMS (ICEMS 2021), 2021, : 998 - 1002
  • [43] A Remote Intelligent Monitoring System for Large Scale Photovoltaic Power Plant
    Yu, D. J.
    Chen, Y. H.
    Zhen, Z.
    Qi, Y.
    Lin, L. S.
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS II, PTS 1-3, 2011, 58-60 : 1892 - +
  • [44] Study on Lightning Protection of Large-Scale Photovoltaic Power Station by Spiral Multiple Pair Blowing Units
    Qin, Honglin
    Huang, Ping
    IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2024,
  • [45] Study on Lightning Protection of Large-Scale Photovoltaic Power Station by Spiral Multiple Pair Blowing Units
    Qin, Honglin
    Huang, Ping
    IEEJ TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [46] Performance Modeling of the Weather Impact on a Utility-Scale PV Power Plant in a Tropical Region
    Gopi, Ajith
    Sudhakar, K.
    Keng, Ngui Wai
    Krishnan, Ananthu R.
    Priya, S. Shanmuga
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY, 2021, 2021 (2021)
  • [47] Large utility scale PV power plant optimum site selection in Iran using GIS analysis
    Hosseini, S. M. Reza
    2019 IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY & DISTRIBUTED GENERATION (ICREDG), 2019,
  • [48] Adaptive Voltage Control for Large Scale Solar PV Power Plant Considering Real Life Factors
    Karbouj, Hazem
    Rather, Zakir Hussain
    Pal, Bikash C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 990 - 998
  • [49] Research on the System Protection for Enhancing the Accommodation and Transmission of Large Scale Wind Power
    He Shien
    Lu Liang
    Li Jin
    Dong Xinzhou
    Shi Shenxing
    Wang Bin
    2016 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2016, : 2363 - 2368
  • [50] Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial
    da Cruz, Lyndon
    Dorn, Jessy D.
    Humayun, Mark S.
    Dagnelie, Gislin
    Handa, James
    Barale, Pierre-Olivier
    Sahel, Jose-Alain
    Stanga, Paulo E.
    Hafezi, Farhad
    Safran, Avinoam B.
    Salzmann, Joel
    Santos, Arturo
    Birch, David
    Spencer, Rand
    Cideciyan, Artur V.
    de Juan, Eugene
    Duncan, Jacque L.
    Eliott, Dean
    Fawzi, Amani
    de Koo, Lisa C. Olmos
    Ho, Allen C.
    Brown, Gary
    Haller, Julia
    Regillo, Carl
    Del Priore, Lucian V.
    Arditi, Aries
    Greenberg, Robert J.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (10) : 2248 - 2254