Image decomposition as a tool for validating stress analysis models

被引:0
|
作者
Patki, Amol [1 ]
Wang, Weizhuo [2 ]
Mottershead, John [2 ]
Patterson, Eann [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Composite Vehicle Res Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
RECOGNITION; INVARIANTS;
D O I
10.1051/epjconf/20100646005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
It is good practice to validate analytical and numerical models used in stress analysis for engineering design by comparison with measurements obtained from real components either in-service or in the laboratory. In reality, this critical step is often neglected or reduced to placing a single strain gage at the predicted hot-spot of stress. Modern techniques of optical analysis allow full-field maps of displacement, strain and, or stress to be obtained from real components with relative ease and at modest cost. However, validations continued to be performed only at predicted and, or observed hot-spots and most of the wealth of data is ignored. It is proposed that image decomposition methods, commonly employed in techniques such as fingerprinting and iris recognition, can be employed to validate stress analysis models by comparing all of the key features in the data from the experiment and the model. Image decomposition techniques such as Zernike moments and Fourier transforms have been used to decompose full-field distributions for strain generated from optical techniques such as digital image correlation and thermoelastic stress analysis as well as from analytical and numerical models by treating the strain distributions as images. The result of the decomposition is 10(1) to 10(2) image descriptors instead of the 10(5) or 10(6) pixels in the original data. As a consequence, it is relatively easy to make a statistical comparison of the image descriptors from the experiment and from the analytical/numerical model and to provide a quantitative assessment of the stress analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARATIVE GENETIC-ANALYSIS - A NEW TOOL FOR VALIDATING THE SCHIZOPHRENIA SUBTYPES
    UNGVARI, G
    ACTA MEDICA HUNGARICA, 1984, 41 (04) : 229 - 238
  • [32] Safety analysis techniques for validating formal models during verification
    de Lemos, R
    Saeed, A
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY, 1999, 1698 : 58 - 66
  • [33] Validating Health Economic Models With the Probabilistic Analysis Check dashBOARD
    Pouwels, Xavier G. L. V.
    Kroeze, Karel
    van der Linden, Naomi
    Kip, Michelle M. A.
    Koffijberg, Hendrik
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (08) : 1073 - 1084
  • [34] Brushlets: A tool for directional image analysis and image compression
    Meyer, FG
    Coifman, RR
    APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL HARMONIC ANALYSIS, 1997, 4 (02) : 147 - 187
  • [35] Empirical Mode Decomposition As A Tool For Data Analysis
    Jimenez, J. R.
    Wu, H. R.
    2011 6TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2011, : 2538 - 2543
  • [36] The Smooth Decomposition as a nonlinear modal analysis tool
    Bellizzi, Sergio
    Sampaio, Rubens
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 64-65 : 245 - 256
  • [37] The smooth decomposition as an output only analysis tool
    Sampaio, Bellizzi
    Bellizzi, Sergio
    EURODYN 2014: IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, : 2897 - 2904
  • [38] Validating image processing algorithms
    Haralick, RM
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 3979 : 2 - 16
  • [39] Validating image in the information age
    Grieve, Deborah
    WORLDWIDE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM THEMES, 2013, 5 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [40] Novel image analysis tool for rapid screening of cell morphology in preclinical animal models of disease
    Guignet, Michelle
    Schmuck, Martin
    Harvey, Danielle J.
    Nguyen, Danh
    Bruun, Donald
    Echeverri, Angela
    Gurkoff, Gene
    Lein, Pamela J.
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (02)