Image decomposition as a tool for validating stress analysis models

被引:0
|
作者
Patki, Amol [1 ]
Wang, Weizhuo [2 ]
Mottershead, John [2 ]
Patterson, Eann [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Composite Vehicle Res Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
RECOGNITION; INVARIANTS;
D O I
10.1051/epjconf/20100646005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
It is good practice to validate analytical and numerical models used in stress analysis for engineering design by comparison with measurements obtained from real components either in-service or in the laboratory. In reality, this critical step is often neglected or reduced to placing a single strain gage at the predicted hot-spot of stress. Modern techniques of optical analysis allow full-field maps of displacement, strain and, or stress to be obtained from real components with relative ease and at modest cost. However, validations continued to be performed only at predicted and, or observed hot-spots and most of the wealth of data is ignored. It is proposed that image decomposition methods, commonly employed in techniques such as fingerprinting and iris recognition, can be employed to validate stress analysis models by comparing all of the key features in the data from the experiment and the model. Image decomposition techniques such as Zernike moments and Fourier transforms have been used to decompose full-field distributions for strain generated from optical techniques such as digital image correlation and thermoelastic stress analysis as well as from analytical and numerical models by treating the strain distributions as images. The result of the decomposition is 10(1) to 10(2) image descriptors instead of the 10(5) or 10(6) pixels in the original data. As a consequence, it is relatively easy to make a statistical comparison of the image descriptors from the experiment and from the analytical/numerical model and to provide a quantitative assessment of the stress analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Risk Map: A new tool for validating risk models
    Colletaz, Gilbert
    Hurlin, Christophe
    Perignon, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (10) : 3843 - 3854
  • [2] Multifractal analysis as a tool for validating a rainfall model
    Garcia-Marin, A. P.
    Jimenez-Hornero, F. J.
    Ayuso-Munoz, J. L.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (14) : 2672 - 2688
  • [3] Validating LORCAT, the Log Recovery Analysis Tool
    Thomas, R. Edward
    Buehlmann, Urs
    Bennett, Neal
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2024, 74 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [4] Image decomposition and uncertainty quantification for the assessment of manufacturing tolerances in stress analysis
    Marcuccio, Gabriele
    Bonisoli, Elvio
    Tornincasa, Stefano
    Mottershead, John E.
    Patelli, Edoardo
    Wang, Weizhuo
    JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2014, 49 (08): : 618 - 631
  • [5] IMAGE EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION: A NEW TOOL FOR IMAGE PROCESSING
    Linderhed, Anna
    ADVANCES IN DATA SCIENCE AND ADAPTIVE ANALYSIS, 2009, 1 (02) : 265 - 294
  • [6] (Φ, Φ*) Image Decomposition Models and Minimization Algorithms
    Le, Triet M.
    Lieu, Linh H.
    Vese, Luminita A.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL IMAGING AND VISION, 2009, 33 (02) : 135 - 148
  • [7] Adaptive variational models for image decomposition
    JianLou Xu
    XiangChu Feng
    Yan Hao
    Yu Han
    Science China Information Sciences, 2014, 57 : 1 - 8
  • [8] Adaptive variational models for image decomposition
    Xu JianLou
    Feng XiangChu
    Hao Yan
    Han Yu
    SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 57 (02) : 1 - 8
  • [9] Adaptive variational models for image decomposition
    XU JianLou
    FENG XiangChu
    HAO Yan
    HAN Yu
    Science China(Information Sciences), 2014, 57 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [10] (Φ,Φ*) Image Decomposition Models and Minimization Algorithms
    Triet M. Le
    Linh H. Lieu
    Luminita A. Vese
    Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2009, 33 : 135 - 148