Image decomposition as a tool for validating stress analysis models

被引:0
|
作者
Patki, Amol [1 ]
Wang, Weizhuo [2 ]
Mottershead, John [2 ]
Patterson, Eann [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Composite Vehicle Res Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
RECOGNITION; INVARIANTS;
D O I
10.1051/epjconf/20100646005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
It is good practice to validate analytical and numerical models used in stress analysis for engineering design by comparison with measurements obtained from real components either in-service or in the laboratory. In reality, this critical step is often neglected or reduced to placing a single strain gage at the predicted hot-spot of stress. Modern techniques of optical analysis allow full-field maps of displacement, strain and, or stress to be obtained from real components with relative ease and at modest cost. However, validations continued to be performed only at predicted and, or observed hot-spots and most of the wealth of data is ignored. It is proposed that image decomposition methods, commonly employed in techniques such as fingerprinting and iris recognition, can be employed to validate stress analysis models by comparing all of the key features in the data from the experiment and the model. Image decomposition techniques such as Zernike moments and Fourier transforms have been used to decompose full-field distributions for strain generated from optical techniques such as digital image correlation and thermoelastic stress analysis as well as from analytical and numerical models by treating the strain distributions as images. The result of the decomposition is 10(1) to 10(2) image descriptors instead of the 10(5) or 10(6) pixels in the original data. As a consequence, it is relatively easy to make a statistical comparison of the image descriptors from the experiment and from the analytical/numerical model and to provide a quantitative assessment of the stress analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image decomposition by grade analysis - an illustration
    Grzegorek, M
    Computer Recognition Systems, Proceedings, 2005, : 387 - 394
  • [22] A pairwise image analysis with sparse decomposition
    Boucher, A.
    Cloppet, F.
    Vincent, N.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 8670
  • [23] Validating BitTorrent models
    David Erman
    Daniel Saavedra
    José Á. Sánchez González
    Adrian Popescu
    Telecommunication Systems, 2008, 39 : 103 - 116
  • [24] Validating prediction models
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7648): : 789 - 789
  • [25] Validating biorobotic models
    Webb, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 3 (03) : R25 - R35
  • [26] Validating Animal Models
    Atanasova, Nina A.
    THEORIA-REVISTA DE TEORIA HISTORIA Y FUNDAMENTOS DE LA CIENCIA, 2015, 30 (02): : 163 - 181
  • [27] Validating domain models
    McGregor, JD
    JOURNAL OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING, 1999, 12 (04): : 12 - +
  • [28] Validating BitTorrent models
    Erman, David
    Saavedra, Daniel
    Gonzalez, Jose A. Sanchez
    Popescu, Adrian
    TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 39 (02) : 103 - 116
  • [29] Validating simulation models
    Troitzsch, KG
    ESM'2004: 18TH EUROPEAN SIMULATION MULTICONFERENCE: NETWORKED SIMULATIONS AND SIMULATED NETWORKS, 2004, : 265 - 270
  • [30] Validating and evaluating models
    Johnson, DH
    MODELING IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: DEVELOPMENT INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION, 2001, : 105 - 119