Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers

被引:25
|
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wolc, A. [1 ,3 ]
Arango, J. [3 ]
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Settar, P. [3 ]
Fulton, J. E. [3 ]
O'Sullivan, N. P. [3 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [2 ]
Fernando, R. L. [1 ]
Garrick, D. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, TX USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Additive effect; dominance effect; genomic selection; layer; SELECTION; VARIANCE; HERITABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12225
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic-based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-REML and BayesC] and pedigree-based (PBLUP-REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP-REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP-REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic-based methods were small (0.01-0.05), with GBLUP-REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP-REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values
    Gowane, G. R.
    Alex, Rani
    Mukherjee, Anupama
    Vohra, Vikas
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2022, 54 (06)
  • [32] Prediction of genomic breeding values for reproductive traits in Nellore heifers
    Costa, Raphael Bermal
    Irano, Natalia
    Solar Diaz, Lara Del Pilar
    Takada, Luciana
    Hermisdorff, Isis da Costa
    Carvalheiro, Roberto
    Baldi, Fernando
    de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes
    Tonhati, Humberto
    de Albuquerque, Lucia Galva
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 12 - 17
  • [33] Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values
    G. R. Gowane
    Rani Alex
    Anupama Mukherjee
    Vikas Vohra
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54
  • [34] A two step Bayesian approach for genomic prediction of breeding values
    Mohammad M Shariati
    Peter Sørensen
    Luc Janss
    BMC Proceedings, 6 (Suppl 2)
  • [35] Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle
    Magnabosco, C. U.
    Lopes, F. B.
    Fragoso, R. R.
    Eifert, E. C.
    Valente, B. D.
    Rosa, G. J. M.
    Sainz, R. D.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (07) : 2752 - 2760
  • [36] On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding
    Meuwissen, Theo H. E.
    Odegard, Jorgen
    Andersen-Ranberg, Ina
    Grindflek, Eli
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2014, 46
  • [37] Prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Jeyun Yeon
    Thuy Tien Phan Nguyen
    Minkyung Kim
    Sung-Chur Sim
    BMC Plant Biology, 24
  • [38] Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in a Commercial Perennial Ryegrass Breeding Program
    Fe, Dario
    Ashraf, Bilal H.
    Pedersen, Morten G.
    Janss, Luc
    Byrne, Stephen
    Roulund, Niels
    Lenk, Ingo
    Didion, Thomas
    Asp, Torben
    Jensen, Christian S.
    Jensen, Just
    PLANT GENOME, 2016, 9 (03):
  • [39] Prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Yeon, Jeyun
    Nguyen, Thuy Tien Phan
    Kim, Minkyung
    Sim, Sung-Chur
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [40] Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs
    Hidalgo, A. M.
    Bastiaansen, J. W. M.
    Lopes, M. S.
    Veroneze, R.
    Groenen, M. A. M.
    de Koning, D. -J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (07) : 3313 - 3321