Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers

被引:25
|
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wolc, A. [1 ,3 ]
Arango, J. [3 ]
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Settar, P. [3 ]
Fulton, J. E. [3 ]
O'Sullivan, N. P. [3 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [2 ]
Fernando, R. L. [1 ]
Garrick, D. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, TX USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Additive effect; dominance effect; genomic selection; layer; SELECTION; VARIANCE; HERITABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12225
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic-based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-REML and BayesC] and pedigree-based (PBLUP-REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP-REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP-REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic-based methods were small (0.01-0.05), with GBLUP-REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP-REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of approaches for estimating the accuracy of genomic prediction in plant breeding
    Estaghvirou, Sidi Boubacar Ould
    Ogutu, Joseph O.
    Schulz-Streeck, Torben
    Knaak, Carsten
    Ouzunova, Milena
    Gordillo, Andres
    Piepho, Hans-Peter
    BMC GENOMICS, 2013, 14
  • [42] Influence of Outliers on Accuracy Estimation in Genomic Prediction in Plant Breeding
    Estaghvirou, Sidi Boubacar Ould
    Ogutu, Joseph O.
    Piepho, Hans-Peter
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2014, 4 (12): : 2317 - 2328
  • [43] Evaluation of approaches for estimating the accuracy of genomic prediction in plant breeding
    Sidi Boubacar Ould Estaghvirou
    Joseph O Ogutu
    Torben Schulz-Streeck
    Carsten Knaak
    Milena Ouzunova
    Andres Gordillo
    Hans-Peter Piepho
    BMC Genomics, 14
  • [44] On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding
    Theo HE Meuwissen
    Jorgen Odegard
    Ina Andersen-Ranberg
    Eli Grindflek
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 46
  • [45] Impact of dominance effects on autotetraploid genomic prediction (vol 60, pg 656, 2020)
    Amadeu, Rodrigo R.
    Ferrao, Luis Felipe V.
    Oliveira, Ivone de Bem
    Benevenuto, Juliana
    Endelman, Jeffrey B.
    Munoz, Patricio R.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (03) : 2240 - 2241
  • [46] Choice of shrinkage parameter and prediction of genomic breeding values in elite maize breeding populations
    Zhao, Yusheng
    Gowda, Manje
    Liu, Wenxin
    Wuerschum, Tobias
    Maurer, Hans P.
    Longin, Friedrich H.
    Ranc, Nicolas
    Piepho, Hans P.
    Reif, Jochen C.
    PLANT BREEDING, 2013, 132 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [47] Persistency of accuracy of genomic breeding values for different simulated pig breeding programs in developing countries
    Akanno, E. C.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Sargolzaei, M.
    Friendship, R. M.
    Robinson, J. A. B.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2014, 131 (05) : 367 - 378
  • [48] Improvement of genomic prediction in advanced wheat breeding lines by including additive-by-additive epistasis
    Raffo, Miguel Angel
    Sarup, Pernille
    Guo, Xiangyu
    Liu, Huiming
    Andersen, Jeppe Reitan
    Orabi, Jihad
    Jahoor, Ahmed
    Jensen, Just
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2022, 135 (03) : 965 - 978
  • [49] Improvement of genomic prediction in advanced wheat breeding lines by including additive-by-additive epistasis
    Miguel Angel Raffo
    Pernille Sarup
    Xiangyu Guo
    Huiming Liu
    Jeppe Reitan Andersen
    Jihad Orabi
    Ahmed Jahoor
    Just Jensen
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2022, 135 : 965 - 978
  • [50] Multi-environment analysis of sorghum breeding trials using additive and dominance genomic relationships
    Colleen H. Hunt
    Ben J. Hayes
    Fred A. van Eeuwijk
    Emma S. Mace
    David R. Jordan
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2020, 133 : 1009 - 1018