Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust

被引:19
|
作者
Linnainmaa, Markku [1 ]
Laitinen, Juha [1 ]
Leskinen, Ari [2 ]
Sippula, Olli [3 ]
Kalliokoski, Pentti [3 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Kuopio Unit, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Kuopio, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
aerosol monitoring; cascade impactor; inhalable dust; IOM samplers; particle size-selective sampling; respirable dust;
D O I
10.1080/15459620701763723
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The performance of four sampling devices for inhalable dust and three devices for respirable dust was tested with different kinds of dusts in the laboratory and in the field. The IOM sampler was chosen as the reference method for inhalable dust, and the IOM sampler provided with the porous plastic foam media was used as the reference method for respirable dust. The other tested instruments were the Button sampler, the optical Grimm aerosol monitor, and the Dekati two-stage cascade impactor with cutoff sizes of 10 and 4 m. The study confirmed the applicability of the IOM and Button samplers. The new foam product followed the respirable criteria well. However, the foam sampler was unstable for measuring inhalable dust, probably due to its moisture absorption. In addition, high dust loads should be avoided with the foam sampler due to increase in filtering efficiency. The concentrations of inhalable dust measured with the Button sampler, the Grimm monitor, and the impactor sampler were usually close to those measured with the reference sampler. On the other hand, impactor sampling yielded higher respirable dust concentrations than the reference method in the field, which may have been caused by particle bounce; high dust loads should be avoided while using the impactor. The results also showed that the Grimm monitor enables real-time dust concentration determinations that are accurate enough for routine monitoring of occupational exposure and for testing efficiency of control measures in workplaces.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PRECISION OF PERSONAL SAMPLING OF RESPIRABLE DUST IN COAL MINES.
    Breslin, John A.
    Page, Steven J.
    Jankowski, Robert A.
    Report of Investigations - United States, Bureau of Mines, 1983,
  • [42] Issues in airborne respirable coal mine dust-sampling
    Ramani, RV
    ICS-MRI '97: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF SAFETY IN MINES RESEARCH INSTITUTES - SELECT PAPERS, 1997, : 267 - 278
  • [43] IMPROVED PULSATION DAMPENER FOR RESPIRABLE DUST MASS SAMPLING DEVICES
    LAVIOLETTE, PA
    REIST, PC
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1972, 33 (05): : 279 - 282
  • [44] EVALUATION OF CEMENT DUST EXPOSURE BY IMPINGER AND RESPIRABLE MASS SAMPLING
    SACHAROV, KM
    GARIS, JN
    KNAUSS, KG
    TANAKA, S
    RAKOW, AB
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1970, 31 (02): : 14 - &
  • [45] CONTENT OF RESPIRABLE AND INHALABLE FRACTIONS IN DUST CREATED WHILE SAWING BEECH WOOD AND ITS MODIFICATIONS
    Hlaskova, Lud'ka
    Rogozinski, Tomasz
    Dolny, Stanislaw
    Kopecky, Zdenek
    Jedinak, Michal
    DREWNO, 2015, 58 (194): : 135 - 146
  • [46] Exposure assessment to inhalable and respirable dust in the post - earthquake construction sites in the city of l'Aquila
    Mastrantonio, Riccardo
    Civisca, Angela
    Siciliano, Eugenio
    Inglese, Enrica
    Lippolis, Tamara
    Pompei, Domenico
    Cococcetta, Lucio
    Scatigna, Maria
    Fabiani, Leila
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2021, 63 (01)
  • [47] LABORATORY EVALUATION OF RDM-201 RESPIRABLE DUST MONITOR
    SAMIMI, B
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1986, 47 (06): : 354 - 359
  • [48] Field comparison of fugitive tailings dust sampling and monitoring methods
    Cleaver, Amy E.
    White, H. Peter
    Rickwood, Carrie J.
    Jamieson, Heather E.
    Huntsman, Philippa
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 823
  • [49] A field comparison of two methods for sampling lead in household dust
    DAVID Q RICH
    LIH-MING YIIN
    GEORGE G RHOADS
    DEBORAH H GLUECK
    CLIFFORD WEISEL
    PAUL J LIOY
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 1999, 9 : 106 - 112
  • [50] A field comparison of two methods for sampling lead in household dust
    Rich, DQ
    Yiin, LM
    Rhoads, GG
    Glueck, DH
    Weisel, C
    Lioy, PJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (02): : 106 - 112