Plastic Packaging, Food Supply, and Everyday Life Adopting a Social Practice Perspective in Social-Ecological Research

被引:13
|
作者
Sattlegger, Lukas [1 ]
Stiss, Immanuel [2 ]
Raschewski, Luca [2 ]
Reindl, Katharina [3 ]
机构
[1] ISOE Inst Social Ecol Res, Res Unit Energy & Climate Protect Everyday Life, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] ISOE, Res Unit Energy & Climate Protect Everyday Life, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, Lund, Sweden
来源
NATURE + CULTURE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
everyday life; materiality; practice theory; provisioning systems; social ecology; CONSUMPTION; MATERIALITY; MANAGEMENT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3167/nc.2020.150203
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article presents practice-theoretical conceptions of societal relations to nature as a fruitful alternative to common system approaches in social-ecological research. Via the example of plastic food packaging, two different practice-theoretical approaches to food supply are discussed regarding their suitability for relating the material properties of packaging to their everyday use by producers, retailers, and consumers: (1) the network approach (portraying food supply as a network of practices; these practices include material elements that interrelate with other elements like competence or meaning) and (2) the nexus approach (investigating the interrelation between social practices and material arrangements in which they take place). Depending on the given research interest, both perspectives have their pros and cons: the network approach is stronger in understanding the everyday use of technologies, while the nexus approach encourages the integration of infrastructures and environmental contexts that are not directly observable within the practice.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 172
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Socially Sustainable Power and Heat Supply. Results from Social-Ecological Research
    Libbe, Jens
    Riechel, Robert
    Timpe, Christof
    Bauknecht, Dierk
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2017, 26 (01): : 70 - 71
  • [22] Building Resilience in Social-Ecological Food Systems in Vermont
    Skog, Kristine Lien
    Eriksen, Stine Elisabeth
    Brekken, Christy Anderson
    Francis, Charles
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [23] Adapting a social-ecological resilience framework for food systems
    Hodbod J.
    Eakin H.
    Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2015, 5 (3) : 474 - 484
  • [24] The social component of social-ecological research: moving from the periphery to the center
    Castillo, Alicia
    Atenea Bullen-Aguiar, Aida
    Luis Pena-Mondragon, Juan
    Georgina Gutierrez-Serrano, Norma
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 25 (01):
  • [25] Natures Running Wild: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Wilderness
    Hofmeister, Sabine
    NATURE + CULTURE, 2009, 4 (03): : 293 - 315
  • [26] Service supply chain resilience: a social-ecological perspective on last-mile delivery operations
    Lin, Yong
    Chen, Anlan
    Zhong, Shuya
    Giannikas, Vaggelis
    Lomas, Carl
    Worth, Tracey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 43 (01) : 140 - 165
  • [27] Modeling Heterogeneous Data Resources for Social-Ecological Research: A Data-Centric Perspective
    Chen, Miao
    Pavalanathan, Umashanthi
    Jensen, Scott
    Plale, Beth
    JCDL'13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH ACM/IEEE-CS JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, 2013, : 309 - 312
  • [28] Social-Ecological Urbanism as a Research Perspective to Analyse Transportation Inequalities in the Region of Łódź, Poland
    Hanzl, Malgorzata
    Olczak, Bartlomiej
    URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 9
  • [29] Social-Ecological Research in sustainable urban and mobility research in Europe
    Richerzhagen, Carmen
    Groeschner, Stefan
    Dreber, Niels
    Thorn, Michaela
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2022, 31 (02): : 124 - 125
  • [30] A social-ecological systems framework for food systems research: accommodating transformation systems and their products
    Marshall, Graham R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2015, 9 (02): : 881 - 908