Adapting a social-ecological resilience framework for food systems

被引:1
|
作者
Hodbod J. [1 ]
Eakin H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Walton Sustainability Solutions Initiatives, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO BOX 875204, Tempe, 85287-5402, AZ
[2] School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO BOX 875502, Tempe, 85287-5502, AZ
关键词
California; Diversity; Food systems; Resilience; Social-ecological systems;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-015-0280-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of applying social-ecological resilience thinking to food systems is twofold: first, to define those factors that help achieve a state in which food security for all and at all scales is possible and second, to provide insights into how to maintain the system in this desirable regime. However, the resilience of food systems is distinct from the broader conceptualizations of resilience in social-ecological systems because of the fundamentally normative nature of food systems: humans need food to survive, and thus, system stability is typically a primary policy objective for food system management. However, society also needs food systems that can intensify sustainably, i.e., feed everybody equitably, provide livelihoods, and avoid environmental degradation while responding flexibly to shocks and uncertainty. Today’s failure in meeting food security objectives can be interpreted as the lack of current governance arrangements to consider the full and differential dimensions of food system functions—economic, ecological, and social—at appropriate scales: in other words, the multifunctionality of food. We focus on functional and response diversity as two key attributes of resilient, multifunctional food systems, respectively, the number of different functional groups and the diversity of types of responses to disturbances within a functional group. Achieving food security will require functional redundancy and enhanced response diversity, creating multiple avenues to fulfill all food system objectives. We use the 2013–2015 drought in California to unpack the potential differences between managing for a single function—economic profit—and multiple functions. Our analysis emphasizes how the evolution of the Californian food system has reduced functional and response diversity and created vulnerabilities. Managing for the resilience of food systems will require a shift in priorities from profit maximization to the management for all functions that create full food security at multiple scales. © 2015, AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 484
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Building Resilience in Social-Ecological Food Systems in Vermont
    Skog, Kristine Lien
    Eriksen, Stine Elisabeth
    Brekken, Christy Anderson
    Francis, Charles
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [2] A Framework for Resilience-based Governance of Social-Ecological Systems
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    Benson, Melinda Harm
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [3] Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity and Social-Ecological Resilience
    Pacheco-Vega, Raul
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 13 (04) : 164 - 165
  • [4] Surrogates for resilience of social-ecological systems
    Carpenter, SR
    Westley, F
    Turner, MG
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 8 (08) : 941 - 944
  • [5] Social learning for resilience in social-ecological systems
    de Kraker, Joop
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 28 : 100 - 107
  • [6] Social-ecological resilience and geomorphic systems
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    Scown, Murray
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 305 : 221 - 230
  • [7] Social Dimensions of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    Barnes, Michele L.
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2019, 1 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [8] Fishermen using social-ecological resilience adapting coastal disasters
    Md. Shafiqul Islam
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2024, 29
  • [10] Protected areas as social-ecological systems: perspectives from resilience and social-ecological systems theory
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Allen, Craig R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (06) : 1709 - 1717