Plastic Packaging, Food Supply, and Everyday Life Adopting a Social Practice Perspective in Social-Ecological Research

被引:13
|
作者
Sattlegger, Lukas [1 ]
Stiss, Immanuel [2 ]
Raschewski, Luca [2 ]
Reindl, Katharina [3 ]
机构
[1] ISOE Inst Social Ecol Res, Res Unit Energy & Climate Protect Everyday Life, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] ISOE, Res Unit Energy & Climate Protect Everyday Life, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, Lund, Sweden
来源
NATURE + CULTURE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
everyday life; materiality; practice theory; provisioning systems; social ecology; CONSUMPTION; MATERIALITY; MANAGEMENT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3167/nc.2020.150203
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article presents practice-theoretical conceptions of societal relations to nature as a fruitful alternative to common system approaches in social-ecological research. Via the example of plastic food packaging, two different practice-theoretical approaches to food supply are discussed regarding their suitability for relating the material properties of packaging to their everyday use by producers, retailers, and consumers: (1) the network approach (portraying food supply as a network of practices; these practices include material elements that interrelate with other elements like competence or meaning) and (2) the nexus approach (investigating the interrelation between social practices and material arrangements in which they take place). Depending on the given research interest, both perspectives have their pros and cons: the network approach is stronger in understanding the everyday use of technologies, while the nexus approach encourages the integration of infrastructures and environmental contexts that are not directly observable within the practice.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 172
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Redefining co-design for social-ecological research and practice: A systematic literature review
    O'Donnell, Mairead
    Collier, Marcus
    Pineda-Pinto, Melissa
    Cooper, Clair
    Nulty, Fiona
    Castaneda, Natalia Rodriguez
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2025, 164
  • [32] Understanding the Challenges and Rewards of Social-Ecological Research in China
    Van Den Hoek, Jamon
    Baumgartner, Jill
    Doucet-Beer, Elena
    Hildebrandt, Timothy
    Robinson, Brian E.
    Zinda, John Aloysius
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 25 (12) : 1324 - 1329
  • [33] A Review of Social-Ecological System Research and Geographical Applications
    Liu, Fang
    Dai, Erfu
    Yin, Jun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [34] Facing global change through social-ecological research
    Folke, Carl
    Gunderson, Lance
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (02):
  • [35] Research on the Morphological Structure of Network Social-Ecological System
    Yao, Min
    Liu, Honglu
    Guan, Xiaolan
    Zhu, Xiaomin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 606 - +
  • [36] The social-ecological web: a bridging concept for transdisciplinary research
    Betz, Lydia
    Kunze, Isabelle
    Prajeesh, Parameswaran
    Suma, T. R.
    Padmanabhan, Martina
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2014, 107 (04): : 572 - 579
  • [37] A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research
    Johnson, Teresa R.
    Beard, Kate
    Brady, Damian C.
    Byron, Carrie J.
    Cleaver, Caitlin
    Duffy, Kevin
    Keeney, Nicolas
    Kimble, Melissa
    Miller, Molly
    Moeykens, Shane
    Teisl, Mario
    van Walsum, G. Peter
    Yuan, Jing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [38] A social perspective in research and practice
    Pies, R
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2000, 51 (04) : 532 - 532
  • [39] Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems
    Janssen, Marco A.
    Bodin, Orjan
    Anderies, John M.
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Ernstson, Henrik
    McAllister, Ryan R. J.
    Olsson, Per
    Ryan, Paul
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (01):
  • [40] Bullying in American schools: a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention
    Grant, B
    JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2005, 34 (01) : 122 - 124