Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T:: Comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging

被引:265
|
作者
Krüger, G [1 ]
Kastrup, A [1 ]
Glover, GH [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Lucas MRS Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
neuroimaging; spiral scan; magnetic field strength; CNR; SNR; physiological noise;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.1081
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Noise properties, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal responses were compared during functional activation of the human brain at 1.5 and 3.0 T. At the higher field spiral gradient-echo (GRE) brain images revealed an average gain in SNR of 1.7 in fully relaxed and 2.2 in images with a repetition time (TR) of 1.5 sec. The tempered gain at longer Tps reflects the fact that the physiological noise depends on the signal strength acid becomes a larger fraction of the total noise at 3.0 T, Activation of the primary motor and visual cortex resulted in a 36% and 44% increase of "activated pixels" at 3.0 T, which reflects a greater sensitivity for the detection of activated gray matter at the higher field, The gain in the CNR exhibited a dependency on the underlying tissue, i.e., an Increase of 1.8x in regions of particular high activation-induced signal changes (presumably venous vessels) and of 2.2x in the average activated areas. These results demonstrate that 3.0 T provides a clear advantage over 1.5 T for neuroimaging of homogeneous brain tissue, although stronger physiological noise contributions, more complicated signal features in the proximity of strong susceptibility gradients, and changes In the intrinsic relaxation times may mediate the enhancement. Magn Reson Med 45:595-604, 2001, (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 604
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Li, Xiaodan
    Chen, Rui
    Xu, Xi
    Xiao, Zebin
    Wei, Xiaoyu
    Yang, Yuelong
    Zhang, Zhongping
    Wu, Zhigang
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Liu, Hui
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [32] Intraindividual comparison of MR-renal perfusion imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Kramer, Harald
    Oesingmann, Niels
    Lodemann, Klaus-Peter
    Miserock, Karl
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (06) : 406 - 411
  • [33] K-T sense-accelerated myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison with 1.5 Tesla
    Schwitter, J.
    Kozerke, S.
    Maredia, N.
    Suerder, D.
    Greenwood, J. P.
    Boesiger, P.
    Plein, S.
    HEART, 2008, 94 : A82 - A83
  • [34] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Placenta at 1.5 Tesla (T).
    Wright, Caroline
    Morris, David M.
    Baker, Philip N.
    Crocker, Ian P.
    Gowland, Penny A.
    Parker, Geoff J.
    Sibley, Colin P.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (03) : 348A - 348A
  • [35] Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T
    Koff, Matthew F.
    Burge, Alissa J.
    Potter, Hollis G.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (07) : 1455 - 1464
  • [36] Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without parallel Imaging
    Alexander, AL
    Lee, JE
    Wu, YC
    Field, AS
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 299 - +
  • [37] Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Perianal Crohn's Disease at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Feasibility Study
    Alyami, Ali
    Hoad, Caroline L.
    Tench, Christopher
    Bannur, Uday
    Clarke, Christopher
    Latief, Khalid
    Argyriou, Konstantinos
    Lobo, Alan
    Lung, Philip
    Baldwin-Cleland, Rachel
    Sahnan, Kapil
    Hart, Ailsa
    Limdi, Jimmy K.
    Mclaughlin, John
    Atkinson, David
    Parker, Geoffrey J. M.
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Little, Ross A.
    Gowland, Penny A.
    Moran, Gordon W.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [38] Reproducibility of Trabecular Bone Structure Measurements of the Distal Radius at 1.5 and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Baum, Thomas
    Duetsch, Yvonne
    Mueller, Dirk
    Monetti, Roberto
    Sidorenko, Irina
    Raeth, Christoph
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Link, Thomas M.
    Bauer, Jan S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (05) : 623 - 626
  • [39] Scan-rescan and intra-observer variability of magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Vidal, Arvin
    Bureau, Yves
    Wade, Trevor
    Spence, J. David
    Rutt, Brian K.
    Fenster, Aaron
    Parraga, Grace
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (23): : 6821 - 6835
  • [40] Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of benign prostatic tissue: findings at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T-initial experience
    Chitkara, Munish
    Westphalen, Antonio
    Kurhanewicz, John
    Qayyum, Aliya
    Poder, Liina
    Reed, Galen
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2011, 35 (04) : 288 - 293